Suomessa säävaroitus vaarallisen huonosta huumorista!

Straight outta the pillowest place alive: Töölö Village in Helsinki, Finland

Do you know that feeling when you’re staring at a shit-ton of money but don’t have your hands on it just yet? Yeah, I do too 🙂

Seuraajien Maailmassa: mediani on haavini*. *be forewarned you are in for a ride if you click-through on this, Spy Soldier. But in a good way: promise 🙂

I mean: with People inside of it, it’s bound to react defensively if threatened. This is not being tied to any specific event going on right now, seriously: it’s just a fact.

Technological Singularity: with the power of technology built by history Humankind begins to expand outward into space whilst simultaneously beginning to expand inward into time. The outward into space is the RT* getting us to go there (*Rocket Technology: with better rockets we have more access into space), the inward into time is the IT getting the knowledge to us faster (with more data access, we have more access into time as it is happening). Both are expansionary movements, and they happen at the same time. They’ve been going on at an accelerating rate for decades, and together they are the singularity that you have now gone through by reading this and hopefully getting it.

First thing you learn after: the solution to all of Mankind’s problems begins with starting to talk about Humankind’s problems. Looking at the set of sets around the sexes: that should help in many things.

I’ve been published in the Financial Times, picture-space included! This is so much more valuable than a Facebook post haha super cool: this deserved a reserve Champagne to celebrate 🙂 “Politiikassa puhutaan yleensä oikeuksista ja niiden saamisesta. Suomessa ja miksipä ei muuallakin pitäisi myös puhua siitä, että kenelläkään ei ole oikeutta jäätyä kuoliaaksi taikka kipeäksikään.”

Originally published January 11th, 2019

EDIT:// April 15th, 2019: Quantum gravity. Given that the word quantum means “how much” it is now dawning upon me how obvious it is that this is what it is all about. Valuation, and how much gravity of emotion (and what type) you attach to a whatever you’re perceiving. I am speechless as to how much d’uh (can I say quantum d’uh?) I am feeling right now.

Given a fixed location of perception, physical gravity is a constant. The emotional gravity of what is perceived is a time-dependent variable.

Essentially this turns Physics into an instruction booklet on how to drive your mind. And that is super cool: I can’t overstate how happy this thought makes me, given who I am (a Turner of the Wheel, a Presser of the Pedal). And when you think about it, the obvious sinks in deeper: accelerating with interest, reversing with disinterest, et cetera et cetera.

First objective lessons of valuation, applies to everyone:

I am Me.

You are You.

Most important lesson of valuation right now, in my opinion: Mark Zuckerberg is an Engineering Superhero who simply could not have had any idea about the scale of what he was building when he started building it. There is literally zero reason to project blame on him for anything looking backward: his measure is what he does now and going forward. He needs help in bringing the realm of social media under control – whatever that is going to mean (Mark: I know you’ve been having trouble accepting this, but I am firm and unshiftable on the opinion that the first step is handing over the supply of ID management to Governments – not only I think this. That sets the stage for a lasting base of Earth/Internet co-operation). Attacking him is not going to help. He is a human being. A Father. If you attack something that lives, it will defend itself. Applies to Mark, as well. No: I do not believe Mark Zuckerberg is a Lizard Robot, even though I know there are suspicions amidst all the turmoil. But yes: I would like to see the fictional history epic of the story where Mark Zuckerberg actually was a Lizard Robot that ate the Planet for dinner 🙂

ps. Even though Matt Damon has been saved so many times from so many situations, they have been imaginary (do you literally seek roles where you must be rescued, Matt?), whereas Saving Mark Zuckerberg is a very real thing and only needs to be done once (hopefully, at least: let’s see what he gets up to in his Days of Old).

By the way, Matt: I really liked that movie where you were small and didn’t go into the Norwegian cult cave. That movie really made me think about the relationship between life on Earth and life inside the Internet. Great piece of art – deserves to be considered as high-class culture alongside all the ancient European shit (which is great.. but REALLY OLD).

pps. on a whole other note concerning matters of valuation: I am only now beginning to let go of the anger I directed at the Physicist Michio Kaku for the diminutive comments he made on the nature of the Cosmos in an interview with Captain Kirk in some documentary I can’t even be arsed to Google. “The Universe is just a symphony..” I invite Michio Kaku to become World Leader in just jokes, to remind us of how grand things of the Cosmos are and how it is not smart to try and compress them into just form.

Diminutive valuation is a form of violence.

Infinite scale as in: the impact of this tool of thought regarding perception is fully dependent on the individual in question using the tool: such as the Elf in this diagram
The Eye of the Needle, building history
Like a bridge between you and the present.

“Equality begins with You. What are your thoughts when your gaze meets another Person, another People?”

“Fusion of matter for electricity creation, as being built at ITER in France, uses the salt water of the Ocean as fuel. Fusion of mind for idea creation, I propose, uses the fresh water of the Lake as fuel: creating an objective, physical evidence for the requirement of hydration for intelligence-creation. So, based on this proposed evidence, should every school student of any age get a water bottle, just like they get a laptop in many places these days? I think yes. I predict good times ahead for all Industries feeding the creation of the Pot, and emptying it.”

“As an Entrepreneur, I believe we must all remember that an idea is like a seed: it is potential life, a path of navigation into the future.”

“As an Entrepreneur, I breathe ideas in through the work of my continued studies into the state of human life, and breathe out the process of selling those ideas to someone: connecting them to a human. Then I breathe in the successful leads, and breathe out the work of making the ideas reality. Basically I’m like a four-stroke internal combustion engine that makes the economy as a whole begin to form from the idea-out.”

The brand-new Oodi Library: yet another reason to love Helsinki.

Valuation is the most objective core of the human mind, the closest-in that we can get whilst remaining in the realm of objectivity: where lies the potential for certainty in agreement between People.

Valuation is what connects us as humans to the world around us, it is what connects us as humans between us, and it is what connects us as humans to our Selves. Valuation guides our perception in the moment: between tasks, between objects, between alternative investment cases of our usage of the time we have as equity in our lives: between whatever and everything: between not caring at all and caring as much as is possible to care.

Valuation is the deepest objective core of thought for – past the conceptual space of valuation where we define our relationships – we enter the realm of the emotions had that create the basis for the existence of the valuation of said emotions, and that is where everyone has their own experience of being, defining the ultimate beginning of the edge of the private sector: the border between our Selves and the outside world. The edge of subjectivity. Valuation, as a conceptual space of thought existent at the very edge of certainty, is objective because we can always talk amongst each other about our relationship with life, which is what valuation – in our subjective use of it – is.

Every day we walk around, we are at least subconsciously valuating our environment. We valuate a green light as we cross the street as the right to cross it safely, and a red light as danger. We valuate a beautiful building that we walk by as the right to feel good about the city that we live in. We valuate the choices we have for lunch and capitalise upon the one we choose to have. Valuation, followed by capitalisation – the taking into use of a valuated “thought result” – leads us into operation, experience, and remembrance: the everlasting process of life itself, enfolding into us with the forces that the world projects out at us and unfolding out of us with the forces the we project unto it.

Whilst psychology looks at human subjects from the outside-in and thus deduces their behaviour from external data, then valuation objectively looks at the world around us from the inside-out and induces our behaviour based on what we perceive. As humans, we are a balance of the community around us and the Self within us. The act of valuation builds a bridge between us and a something, allowing us to discuss our relationship with the something. The act of valuation is like the refinement of our operating instructions, guiding our perception and the resulting senses in the everyday. It is as natural a flow of thought as any other in Nature.

Valuation is what allows us to ask the question: “Why?”

Psychology is a classical science in that it looks at humans outside of the observing psychologist in an objective data-based manner and compares them between each other (comparing a particle of data with the whole set), keeping the psychologists themselves out of the equation for the maintenance of scientific objectivity.

Valuation, on the other hand, is what allows for the other side of the mirror to speak: for the individual human object, the Self that a psychologist is studying, to let the psychologist know what they are thinking and why. Valuation comes from within the Self, and then psychology looks at the aggregate human behavioural results, drawing upon aggregate data to create scientifically justifiable conclusions that can be used to help individuals in their lives – fed back to the Self. Thought of in a way, this is a bit like the relationship between market participant and macroeconomist: data-source to data analyst, creating a discussion about where life stands in the moment that is being had, as viewed by those having the discussion.

The bridge between the observer and the observed can be built directly, human-to-human, or indirectly through the data, human-to-statistics-to-human.

Classical and Quantum Natures

There is an inherent classical and quantum nature to valuation. By classical I posit a needs-based mindset, such as the valuation of water: there isn’t much subjectivity in the valuation of water, since either you drink enough of it at regular intervals or you die. Every force has an equal and opposite reaction: thirst will move you towards water, the body will take control. At the margin of absolute necessities the human becomes comparable to an animal: purely predictable in its behaviour, thanks to the infinite power of the will of life to live and the automating mutations that evolution has provided with us so that, when it comes to necessities, we don’t really even have to think.

As a side note, I believe that that is why yoga is so powerful for me personally: in that, for example, the taking into control of the breathing is very effective in reconnecting with one’s body. It is like taking over from autopilot. Thought of in this Yoga First -way, where automations can be taken over from, the human body is much like a vessel that we pilot with our hearts and minds, spirits and souls (and, of course, the contracts that we are signatories of!). Thought of in this way, for me at least, it is also easier to remember “human vessel maintenance”, for who would want to ride upon a non-maintained vessel? 

By quantum, which in latin means how much, I mean a wants-based mindset, such as the valuation of a car: how much added value does a car bring to my mobility requirements in life, as opposed to relying on public transport or walking around the city? In classical arenas of thought there are objectively correct answers (eg. drink water), whereas subjectivity enters the frame once we step on to the quantum side of the consideration of value: when we are not pushed into the margin. The objective value of water is life, the subjective value of a car is convenience: two completely different areas of reasoning, requiring completely different toolsets of thought. All of this is, of course, Person & People, time- and place-specific.

Learning to valuate one’s surroundings is an acquired skill based on the potential for overcoming the experience of living with just necessities. A body and mind that seeks to survive day-in, day-out, doesn’t waste energy on considering what it cannot have: thus the capacity to have hope and dream is what moves such a body and mind forward, whereas the lack of hope is what maintains us in a protective state of holding on to what we’ve got: not valuating the future, but maintaining the present-past.

Hope is a primary ingredient in creating movement, but the world runs on much more than hope, starting with fear and money but also work and joy. The components of building one’s own way forward, ultimately, start with the valuation of one’s own emotions in a pre-Entrepreneurial timespace, however spacious and intense that is for any given individual.

Valuational skill is high valuable: the capacity to perceive, think, and act in moments of varying passing-by speed. The success of work is dependent on the capacity to valuate between the choices available in different situations, for example in being able to choose the correct tools required to perform a task, or to see an existent opportunity as it serendipitously comes into view. In life, we navigate with valuation, in all its different forms across all the different manners of life that there are. Learning how to understand our surroundings is directly correlated with our ability to operate them, and once we get down to the matter of what counts, then it’s the story that we’re telling, the story that we’re selling, as we get to work, that moves us forward.

The story that’s always built on some form of valuation.

The teaching of valuation

At its cleanest level – at its most objective – valuation is learned with the very basic mathematics of classical finance. The values of time and money are combined by discount rates (assumptions of opportunity cost), and with these tools different objects-in-valuation are given a numerical price based on some logical premise, such as a number based on comparable investment options – the practical definitions of opportunity cost. At its most objective – as valuation is being taught now – the numbers of time, money, and interest rates lead the way in determining what is worthy and what isn’t.

Objectivity is maintained purely by the supremacy of the number.

Where the teaching of valuation lacks is that it remains in the classical mindset of needs, where the supremacy of the number can be justified. Overall, in the realm of needs, money and time need to grow – there is no question about that – since that is a sign of the continuous birth of the needs-based economy and tells of the fact that needs are being met.

What the teaching of valuation requires next is the introduction of the subjective, wants-based quantum mindset, where we value targets of desire and determine how much we are willing to work for them. In this realm of thought, we can assume that fiscal losses can be argued as worthy: we can spend €100,000,000 extra on a building, if we wish to make it more beautiful and high-end, for example. We can positively valuate the artistic value of architecture, and the positive value of creating challenging work for the Craftspeople that build it. Past the needs-based Classical mindset, the wants-based Quantum mindset allows us to incept an infinite amount more emotion into the workings of the economy.

The Quantum mindset allows us to make the economy so much better. So much better that I simply lack the hyperbolic expletives to convey the full emotion of understanding its value to us as a civilisation. It allows us to begin truly mastering the growth of value, by understanding what value can mean, in the first place.

To Conclude

To recall the basics of everything quantum, we must remember the simple, Physics-proven reality that two states can exist at once within one thing. That there are two sides to every coin. A euro is a euro for everyone, meaning it is objective in number, but how much it is worth in terms of value is inherently subjective, dependent on who’s talking.

To put it another way, in order to reinforce the point being made above, the nature of money and time are quantum because, whilst they share an objective outer shell, they simultaneously hold within the subjective valuation of what that means for whoever is doing the considering of the objective outer shell in question: whatever it whenever and wherever is. A euro is a euro for everyone, just as a second is a second for everyone, but what meaning or what value we attribute to those objective units of money and time – that is up to each of us as individuals, and we must talk to each other to understand that. Not just through Microsoft Excel, but with actual People, directly, as well. These are like two endpoints of societal analysis.

The calculation of the growth of the number is a skeleton, but we must breathe a deeper understanding of value unto it for the birth of the meat around the bones.

Quantum valuation is all about the teaching of the individual to think for themselves about what they value in life in the moment and across time, so that they may hold the skill of navigating for themselves, instead of being wholly dependent on others: so, in practice, we are considering the progression of Children becoming Adults, capable of thinking for themselves. Aside being a way to understand the nature of individual human beings for the value-creative purposes of business, it is a path for us to understand our Selves and, thus, reinforce our identities and be more comfortable with who we are: to learn to sell our Selves, to our Selves, so that we can function better as part of organisations, where many Selves gather – the better they function together, the better the quality of the value created. We can educate ourselves to be better consumers that serve ourselves, not just the economic machine (which we do, however, wish to service, so that it may continue to serve us).

Ultimately, valuation is where the border between classical and quantum thought lies, and it – the border itself – belongs in the Academic realm of the Market Sciences. We must own this border, for it is what our science is based upon, and it is where we excel, for it is what we have been doing, all along, anyway.

When we valuate, we set the direction. In the Market Sciences, we are navigators.

Some banter follows:

The Quantum Mechanics: We the Salespeople, who make it happen!

The Valuation Slogan: “It’s up to You!”

Pretty much the Aggregate Children-Parents Negotiation?

“From Me through You, on to the Table – the Contract Stew – creating value for the Many, as operated by the Few.”

An idea, now a memory: equity has arrived.
An idea, now a memory: equity has arrived.
Because it is You.

“I’d most like the experience of speaking to Leonardo DiCaprio about the possibility that intertemporal dream-world travel might actually be completely real, and of value. Maybe Elon Musk would be interested in joining that Ring, so that I might understand how that simulation stuff makes sense to Him, and whether or not He would like to come out of it, or not, and whichever way he decides, I’d like to understand his reasoning, nonetheless. Sounds like a great Pot of Idea, maybe worth One party haha”

Liikkellepanijan liikkeiden valuaatiomarkkina huudettu – Ken perustaa? Vai meneekö yli Johtajan yksityisyydensuojan rajojen, laittaa webcamit päälle? 😀

“One of my favourite views of Nature would definitely have to be the Moon expunging itself into its Fullest Form, from the pillowy darkness of the night and nightier sky. It is a stirling romance of massive and immassive physical forces, because it could also be looked as the night letting go of a pearl: strong enough to have held something so valuable within, but even stronger in letting it go (knowing it gets to start eating the Moon’s Perfection right away again, after its Full moment of starlight & glory has passed and moved on, beginning to form the next one to be had, in about or exactly a month or so from now, whenever that is).”

“By calculating where the most probable last-place-on-Earth would be for there to be clean water at, and when this last-water event-time should most probably occur, scientists of the Earth could create a really true-to-Earth valuation map for the ultra-long term real-estate investors out there. I’d buy in to the value of that Map, and its guidance in making fiscal decisions.”

“In Tinder you’re valuating immense mass at swipe-speed. It’s good to realise that every swipe carries the weight of a potential life, and that can mean a lot of things, so preparation on motivationals – before going into the app – is important. Past that, it’s a matter of agreement between individual human beings that is completely natural. If the motivations match, so will the vibes. For safety’s sake, in the future when I myself have kids exploring such ecosystems, I’d prefer there to be a version of the app where log-in and thus ID security – including location – is maintained by a State-level official. If there were cleverness in the State Machine, then they would realise at State-level Leadership that packaging data security services through the creation of an ID object for a Citizen, that is then sold on to for use to different app providers that require a Citizen to log into their services, would be a good Natural business to get into. States should create ID objects to be sold-for-use by service providers. It is my belief that, ultimately, the State should own the market for ID creation & maintenance, and that that is its core function, when looked at purely from the Money-level. I prefer to associate highest levels of trust, required at the core function-level, to State Flags. As a money-operant, I like that sense of stability in a base of Grounded Trust that the State provides, which is what it does when it is providing ID-distribution services.”

Objects, best tools, at the end of the day
Objects: Best tools, at the end of the day
How to Modern Party: Share It Later
Lighter breathing, more beautying
I think Case Weinstein (or any other de-seating of a Leader) gives evidence that is fair enough to be considered as a positive way that Nature works.
Really depends on the Crowd-type One hangs out with.
It would always be my Primary Pricing Base:
how deep do I go into the debt pool, for the view
But dropping the Baby is something that scares me.
Olisiko tämä sisäsotilaallinen teko, alivoimaisuustunteet ulospäin muille projisoiden? Kun se on tehty kotimaisilla kielillä, kotimaisilla palvelimilla tarjoiltuna ja kotimaan alueelta kirjoitettuna, kunnioittaako se muiden valtioiden naamansäilytyksellisoikeudellista suvereniteettiä? Vai olisiko (vaativan) kielellisen käännöstyövaateen myötä todettava olevan niin, että ainoa tapa miten ulkomainen toimija voisi tästä loukkaantua olisi se, että Hänen olisi tarkkailtava Jensin liikkeitä ja olla todennut Hänen sisältönsä mielenkiintoiseksi, motivoiden (vaativan) kielenkäännöksellisen työn, motivaation olemassaolon todisteeksi sen samalla synnyttäen. Mikäli on osoittanut Näin Paljon työtä seuratakseen Jensin kirjoituksia niin pitäisi ulkomaisten toimijoiden viimeistään tässä vaiheessa tajuta, että tämä on Läppää ja Sen Juurta: kasvamassa keskenään
Pohjolassa: myös vitusti kaikennäkösii ongelmia, ei pelkkää hevenii.”
Building Cities, pretty awesome stuff if you’re into long-term imagination-work, which in Sales: we do.

“Vähintään Ihmisen tulisi olla nähtynä kysynnän Tekijänä. Vähintään.

Some Finnish policy (in Finnish)

“Selittelemmekö me itsellemme kehollisten impulssiemme syytä vai selitteleekö kehomme meille miksi niistä ei olisi syytä piitata? Tasapaino tuntuu olevan tärkein tekijä moraalirauhan säilyttämisessä, ja kehonhallinnallinen koulutus pitäisi järjestää Suomessa asuville ja tänne saapuville. Kansallinen joogasubventio voisi tehdä erinomaista terää, myös osana maahanmuuttajien kotoutusta: jooga on ihanan puolueeton ihmisiä yhdistävänä voimana ja tekee yhdistävää (vähintään Itseensä) työtä sekä kehon että mielen tasoilla.”

“Suomessa spesifisti, koulutustarinamme kautta nähtynä, on se vaikea sukupolvienvälinen crowding-out ongelma taloudessa meneillään, että vuosikymmenet ollaan koulutettu nuoria älykköjä mutta kun sitten tulisi aika väistyä Vanhana pois tieltä ja myöntää, että olemme itse rakentaneet (koulutuksen ja teknologian myötä) nopeammin kiihtyneet seuraajamme jotka haluavat nyt ohi, niin sitten pelottaa jäädä eläkkeelle ja vapauttaa sitä rajallista johtajuuspinta-alaresurssia nousevien sukupolvien käytölle, joilla olisi kasvupotentiaalia käytettävissään nuoremman iän myötä enemmän kuin Vanhoilla, ja ajankohtaisempi asia- ja ihmistuntemus käytössään korkeamman arvopotentiaalin tuottajiksi ja realisoijiksi. On kuin oltaisiin ladattu nuorisomme kiitotielle lentokoneeseen joka tarvitsee kolmannesta pitemmän kiitotien noustaakseen turvallisesti: ruuma täynnä tietoa mutta ei väylää minkä kautta sen arvoa työnteon myötä rahaksi voisi muuttaa. Pitää muistaa, että isompaa muutosta johtava verkostovalta ei muutu digitaalisessa silmänräpäyksessä: se ikään kuin kasvaa läpi kansallistasoisten ihmisjuurten yli ajan, tehden verkostovallasta rajallisen resurssin, monellakin eri tapaa arvioituna. Jos tämä rajallinen resurssi on elänyt liian kauan sukupolvensiirrosvastaisuuden kahlitsemana, niin liiallisen määritelmänä se on alkanut tuhota arvoa sekä hetkessä että potentiaali-demotivaation tuoman menetyksen kautta. Loppupeleissä sukupolvien välillä vallitseva kahlitsevaisuusaste on määriteltävissä vain organisaation sisällä, sitä kokevien henkilöiden toimesta. Suomen kohdalla, viime vuosikymmenten kehityksen saattamana, merkittävän koulutusaste- ja samanaikaisen talouden nousukiitokehityksen myötä voi mielestäni sanoa niin, että sukupolvien välisessä kahlitsevuusasteessa on jotain systeemisempää meneillään, tällä hetkellä.

Sukupolvienväliset allokaatiot kansan jokavuotisissa rahavirroissa – eli kuinka paljon jokavuotisesta käteisvirrasta pysähtyy minkäkin sukupolven edustajan tilille – olisi hyvä olla kohdennettuja siten, että varhais-Aikuisuuden panos-tuotto suhde olisi hetkessä arvioituna liioitellumpi: nuoremmille maksettaisiin enemmän palkkaa aikaansa vastaan kuin mikä heidän työn suora vaikutus on taloudelle, sillä sijoitusperusteluolettamalla, että tämä olisi toimenpide joka vahvistaisi heidän elintasollista asemaansa ja siten vakauttaisi elämän peruspilarit sellaisiin rakenteellisiin muotteihin jonka varassa kasvaa vakaat kodit (joka puolestaan ennaltaehkäisee tulevaisuuden kuluja, eräänlaisena kilven projisointina). Perinteiseen hitaaseen palkkanousuun, joka maaduttaa kokonaisia työelämiä turhaan paikalleen tai estää niitä alkamasta lainkaan – masentaen kustannusloukuissa eläviä ihmisiä – niin ehdottaisin itse työelämäosapuolille suunniteltavaksi sellaista järjestelmää joka toisi nopeata nousua kärkeen suoraan koulusta ulostautuessa ja siitä rauhallisesti hidastuvaa palkkakehitystahtia läpi työelämän, kuin auton kiihtyvyyskaaren muotoinen polku. Tämä nopea kiihdytys olisi velanotto nuoremmalta sukupolvelta itselleen, että raha todella ratkaisisi monen ongelman kodin sisältä ulospäin, ja vaatisi kuria aiennetun korkeamman elintason hallitsemisessa: Suomen nuoremmat sukupolvet saisivat eräällä tavalla ajateltuna tehokkaamman auton ajettavakseen, ja voimankohotusta olisi syytä kunnioittaa. Oikein työkaluin – esimerkiksi eläkerahastoja lainavakuutena Pankeille käyttäen – voisi Suomen työelämä toteuttaa nuorempien, unohdettujen sukupolvien uudelleennousemuksen. Jos heihin – koulutettuihimpiimme – sijoitetaan nyt uskon voimalla lainaa, niin heidän vastineeksi tekemän työn pitäisi kyetä maksamaan kyseiset lainat takaisin: korkoineen. Kaikki tämä olisi loppupeleissä mahdollista, mikäli Suomen Myyjät ovat korkeimmalla tasollaan huippukunnossa: lisärahan tekeminen redusoituu aina korkeamman tason myyntitaitoon, voimanhallinnalliseen kykyyn pyytää suurempia numeroita. Vaikka se hieman vitsikkäämmin ajateltuna kuulostaa aika härskiltä, niin meidän tosiasiallisesti pitää laittaa nuoremmat, unohdetuksi tulevat sukupolvemme “myyntikuntoon”. Jotta saamme heidät myytyä korkeamman tason parempipalkkaisiin hommiin jossa he tuottavat korkeamman tason ainesta myytäväksi niin he ansaitsevat kaiken odottelun jälkeen etupainotteista korvausta, luottamuksen osoituksena: myös sen takia, että palkka tutkitusti lisää itseluottamusta, joka vahvistaa myyntiaineksen laatua entisestään. Mutta tässä Myyntivoimien pitää kyetä myymään Suomessa tehdyn työn arvoa: ei kyvyssään hinnoitella tehokkuustaipumustemme myötä itseämme halpapeluriksi, vaan itsekunnioituksessamme nähdä osaamisemme hyvinvointia luova arvo ja asettaa numeromme riittävän korkealle, kunnioitusasteemme mukaisesti.”


“Ehdotan täten, kiinnostuksen avaruutta kohtaan ylläpidettäväksi, että Lappiin rakennetaan mahdollisimman kalliilla hyper-eksklusiivinen avaruusteleskooppi matkailukohteeksi. Avaruuskokemuksen kuvanlaadun erinomaisuus-todennäköisyyden maksimoinniksi kohde pitäisi rakentaa mahdollisimman kauas Luontoon. Sinne pitäisi voida saapua korkeimman luksuksen kuljetuksella tai metsäreitin läpi moniöisesti patikoiden: ihan miten kukin oman eeppisyytensä koskaan sitten hinnoitteleekaan. Itse teleskooppi- ja yöpymiskokemus olisi korkeimman arvoluokan kokemus: hotellin palvelutaso olisi Monarkeille sopivaa, vähintään, mutta toivottavasti muunkaltaisillekin Tähdille kuten Jay Z:lle ja Beyoncélle tai Obamojen perheelle. Nautinnollisen avaruudenkatselukokemuksen jokainen yksityiskohta olisi erittäin tarkasti suunniteltu, Lapin ääriolosuhteiden kaikkien vuodenaikojen erikoisuuksien laatuvaikutannolliset yksityiskohdat suunnittelussa huomioiden, ulkomainen vieraspotentiaali aktiivisesti tiedostaen. Jännittävyystasoa laskettaisiin korkeimmalla mahdollisella laatutasolla koska ne suomalaisten avaruusprofessorien tarinat sen avaruuden suuruudesta voi olla välillä jopa hieman pelottavia: joten ruoan pitää maistua, ja sen takia tarvitaan korkeimman laatuluokan ammattikokkeja mukaan tähän toteutusoperaatioon: koska ruoalla unohtuu avaruus, ja muistuu täyttymys. Arvon kasvatus olisi varmasti taattua sillä matkojen tuotoksia ne niin sanotut diilit usein ovat: ja kun liikutetaan isoja rahoja, niin luottamusta kannattaa rakentaa isoilla rahoilla. Tälleen Kansat saavat parhaansa esille. Yksi tärkeä yksityiskohta olisi, että osana kokemusta rakennuskompleksissa olisi herätyskelloja vain varatuille teleskooppi- ja ruokailuajoille: ei mitään sänkyyn liittyvää. Täten Suomi viestisi kauniin objektiivisesti, että Suomessa: Sänkyyn nouskohon, Ken haluaa ja laskeutukoot sieltä kun tahtoo.

“Sitten – heti perään – haluaisin, että vastaavan visualiikan laatutason omaavia keskuksia voisi rakentaa kolme enemmän: jokainen omana arkkitehtonisena taideteoksenaan, aina siis riittävän kauas Luontoon, ettei visualiikan laatutaso kärsi. Jokainen avaruuskatselukeskus olisi astetta matalampi laatutasossa matkailukohteena, Prima Donnasta alaspäin verraten, ja se perusastetason keskus olisi opetuslaitoksen omistuksessa, varmistaakseen sen, että jokainen suomalaista koulua käyvä lapsi näkisi vähintään kerran alakouluikäisenä avaruuteen (eli jos sää pilaa yhden matkan, järjestetään toinen: aina). Sitten olisi myös yksi salainen keskus joka olisi Akatemian yksityisessä käytössä ja omistuksessa, tutkimusta ja hallinnollista yksityisyyttä varten. Täten ennustan rakennusalalle valtavaa buumia lähivuosille tai vuosikymmenille – todennäköisesti vuosikymmenille, sillä en usko, että valtiolta ihan hetkessä näitä masseja heruu: mutta askel kerrallaan. Hyvää myyden, hyvää tulossa.”

Exemplar use of Time Perception: “Finland can think as a sovereign, for that is what we are. I do not consider Finland as part of a warring construct of history between East and West, which destroys significant amounts of potential value that is available to be had for the benefit of all; value that can begin to be created through the construction of the proper international contracts and the subsequent intergenerational deployment of the required operative skill practiced at the highest levels of responsibility and remuneration. I paid attention in geography class, I paid attention in history class. I love both subjects deeply: they form the base of understanding the Market Sciences, which is what I’m all about. Finland is North: Far North, to be precise. The People that live here came from all over the place and have spent the past 11,000 years negotiating with Frost itself. We can carry our own weight. We don’t need Others to scare us – Nature does that for us all on its own.”

3 thoughts on “Valuation”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *