On Earth

I believe the Flags do not by their nature fight. By their disnature, they should fall into co-operative disrepair. But by their nature, Flags do not fight. When some day it will, inevitably, be Us versus Aliens (there’s no logical way to deny it: so it always make sense to prepare for some day), then I would not give them the respect of the Carriership of the Flag, even if they presented one to me. They would have to earn that with civil conduct and the capacity to exchange value through peaceful means: the kind where it is created, not destroyed. If they did so, I should consider whatever symbol they carry as their combinatorial function to be a Flag. But I am not expecting to wake up to Aliens. Not in this lifetime, at least, and luckily there’s still plenty of that left (I’m aiming for a 2111 post-body departure ship. I’m thinkin’: think about it once in a while, and it’ll come to you better).


I have outsourced the concept of infinite happiness to the Animals. That allows me to live in happiness and when I am not happy, I will consider myself slightly mentally ill. Since the Animals understand happiness better than I do, they will come at me through their silly memes on the Internet and heal me. Meanwhile, I will keep on going with my daily/weekly/etc. routine and just stop thinking about the Animals: the meme-weather will go away naturally. Thinking about things like this, I can learn to think about slight mental illness, just as a flu is not the same thing as pneumonia. That makes the entire concept much more approachable for the consideration of what it means when things get worse: because they really do, for many People, and since they haven’t, for me, that is why I choose to keep doing my best to help serve them through my money-based taxes and money-free community work (talk about private/public sector co-operation on the Individual-dimension, because that’s what it is: creating two fronts at the same time).


Mielestäni Rick & Morty on vähän niin kuin omissa säkeissään asumista. On jatkuvasti tilanteita missä päästään pälkähästä hyppäämällä jollain random-generaattorilla pinteestä poispäin, ihan kuin hattivatti tai sperma tai hattivattisperma joka nousee taistoon kerta toisensa jälkeen pelastamaan tilanteen syntymällä uudelleen. Mutta sitten taas tätähän kaikki piirretyt tai muuten jaksosta toiseen linkittymättömät sarjat ovat (varmasti on piirrettyjä jossa on pieruhuumoria edistyneempää tarinanvirtaa). Logiikka käskee tietämään linkittymättömien sarjojen ymmärtämisen. Silloin pystyy havaitsemaan poksahtelevaa tajunnanvirtaa, uudelleensyntymisen tuskaa ja tietämättömyyttä, toki myös seikkailuhalukkuutta. Tositilanteissa ei sitten kuitenkaan paljoa seikkailla: silloin käytetään harjoitettua tietoa. Mutta niissä piirretyissä: kyllähän ne seikkailut hauskoja ovat.

Olen viime aikoina miettinyt paljon jo lapsesta asti kantamaani omaa sanontaa: “in life there is no reset button.” Tämän viisauden oppiminen oli loppupeleissä lähtöistä puhtaasti siitä, että ajoin ja ajan edelleen paljon F1-simulaattorilla ja siinä logiikka on todellisuuteen hieman käänteinen: oma ajotyylini on se, että alan heti metsästämään maksimijarrutuspistettä ja optimoimaan huippuaikaa hidastamalla jarrutuksia kun meni yli –> reset. Todellisuudessa näin ei voi tehdä, joten mutkaa lähestytään varovaisemmin, sitten kierros kierrokselta nopeuttaen: kuin eläintä preerialla vaaniessa ja kaataessa.

Varmistan toki aina harjoittavani todellisuuden logiikkaa todellisuudessa, ja mielikuvituksen mielikuvituksessa! 😀 Startup-maailmasta etenkin kun kumpuaa niin mielikuvitusmoodissa eläminen (jonka moodissa ei voisi loputtomasti olla) ja siitä elämisestä poisoppiminen pitää kokemalla oppia: ei sitä luonnonprosessia vaan voi millään pelkästään opettaa. Ehkä pitäisi perustaa erillinen Yrittäjäkorkeakoulu: se voisi olla luonnollinen omana eriytettynä oppilaitoksenaan. Ainakin siinä, että se toteuttaisi omaa luontoaan Kauppakorkeakoulujen Instituutiota vastaan kilpailemalla: rekrytoinneista sisään ja ulos toimittaessaan.

Could be fun 😉


One of the main problems on Earth: too many advisors to leadership. Removes time from capability to lead if too many.


Understanding the importance of Family begins with understanding your Family, and then Family as a concept. As a surface-fan of Lord of the Rings, I really like thinking how the ring, as a technology, really embodies one of the great leaps made through time: the signification of becoming from Child into Adult. What’s fun thinking about, in relation to LotR, is what the ring of rings is in reality.


For anyone who understands compression: think about the fidelity of the outcome data that is growing in politics as relatively compared across time to when politicians had to think enough to write a full page to convey a thought: now that is being compressed into tweets and rapid-fired like a machine gun at society (recipient of political data, by nature of sales cycle). Do we want that? I am honestly of the opinion that the Finnish Government should be turned into the most objective supercomputer that can be designed (everyone has to be able to understand it for trust) so that we can just press delete on politics as it has stood until this day and redefine it so that it makes sense in the times of tomorrow.

We have elections coming up. I’m going to not vote for the first time in my life, since I literally feel it is the best vote I can give. I’ve literally had enough of the system of thought where those who yell loudest and most violently (which literally means against the entire concept of rationality: the exact worst way to get to the money, it is what inspires higher security investments?) should literally have to be listened to.


Defines long-term success. Not aimed for: held. Like Base. Remember: if you overdesign it with all the hippies selling self-help, you’ll probably be overdriving it, as well. Life lives on much broader timescales than the distance to the next time someone loses their shit and brings it together with a book. And I am not saying there is anything wrong with that: writing is (not even probably: is) the best mental recovery there is. I’m just saying that on the demand-side of the calculation some People overdo it with the books and underdo it in the lived reality where skills are practiced and then formed to be had.
If so, whatever? There can be no absolute understanding of data sub-organism impact on whole.

Love: it begins with processing time. It can be accelerated further in various ways, of which money is one.


The reason this post is titled “On Earth” is because that is where I am.


Have you heard of the fear of the fear of the Child? Now you have 🙂


It is not that the state of nature is war. It is that war is not the state of nature. It is the state of destructive nature. Is that what we are in, in destroying the nature? Maybe some of the Old can answer that: you know, because they control the Money – not for any other discriminatory reason than the familial logic. By default, Money (especially with a capital “M”: like the concept) and its holding is equatable to Elders. It would be silly the other way (full Elder-to-Child outsourcing): that a Baby should be born and act as Bank for the Dying? Maybe that is why they died, and became the silly joke (though if you objectify life to a constant on-going meat trade, then that is sort of exactly what it is and it is gross in a way haha).

For me, at least, the Elder is the Money. It also sort of means, Elder: you’re not dead yet: get to work learning about climate change prevention technology and meeting the People that make it so that you can assess in all your Earth-born wisdom whether or not they are trustworthy People to lead us on this quest into the Heavens of the times after the climate change was prevented and we could tell stories about it and drink merrily into the night and wake up with shit on our face because – “hey, it got wild at the Farm.” (fell asleep in the barn): that’d make a great country song (plz send royalties).


Eläin ja raha: kaksi eri asiaa. Aivan kuten aika ja raha. Tämän pitäisi olla eläinasioiden taloustieteeseen mukaan seostamisen lähtökohta. Arvojen positiivista kehittymistä ajatellen, siis. Maanviljelijät voisivat puhua tästä, ja opettaa Akatemiaa oikein rankalla kokonaisuudella näistä asioista. Pitäisikö ehdottaa MTK:lle? Heidän meininki, tavattuna viime vuonna Arkadia-verkoston kautta, on ollut vakuuttavinta operatiivisen ajattelun esittämistä (jätettäköön tilaa akateemiselle ajattelulle ja muulle ajattelulle tietenkin, myös) mitä olen tavannut matkallani läpi koko työurani. Todella toivoisin tätä keskustelua, välittömällä aikataululla.


Mikään ei ole tuhoisampaa talousajattelulle kuin taloustiedekunta jonka päällimmäisin henkinen asenne rahaan on sen minimointi. Tämänkaltaiset Ihmiset eivät ymmärrä talousjärjestelmän käytännön operoinnista kuin puolet ja siten he väistämättä toiminnallaan ohjaavat puolitäyteistä ajattelua käytäntöön neuvonannollaan. Suomessa on paljon näitä tiedekuntia. Historialliset syyt olemassaoloon ovat selvät – Suomi on ollut köyhä ja merkittävästi huonommin koulutettu kuin nykyään. Yhdysvaltalaisjohtoinen tieteensuunta edustaa pitkälti yhteiskunnan alistamiseen pohjautuvaa ajattelua, josta on todisteet kaikilla suunnilla (myös siitä, että tämä on lopputulos heillä omasta ajattelustaan ja sen toimeenpanosta).


Speed is a healthy way to think about things: we all understand it innately from the evolution of our movement from baby wriggle to office sit. It is also very important with smartphones in the Digital Age, because our minds are running at significantly heightened frequencies as compared to times before modern technology. We need to understand speed, parallel processes and alteration times better: otherwise we are not handling smartphones and modern technology safely, as proven by the general state of behaviour in the present day. I am quite surprised about the lack of IT industry veterans getting up off of their retired asses to speak about balance and control regarding the system they’ve created.

There are no better segments of Old to speak to the Young than the IT industry veterans. They’ve built the piping of the modern world: we now have to start setting them straight and cleaning them up.


I know in my life that simply because of how I behave I might have been perceived as a spy. But in and of itself a Person of the Money behaves like a spy, because they must always ascertain the reliability of the Other from the perspective of a potential impact on their fiscal-impacting brand (which has an impact on quality of life, if quality has a strong correlating measure with the amount of money reliably had). So, with all due respect for everyone out there who is struggling (as an Entrepreneur, this includes myself), then the Money itself is never to be blamed for any of the world’s misgivings. It is a question of how the Money is channeled. After that it is simply a question of are we ready or not to learn from the past and act upon it to deploy equity in a different way, ultimately resulting in an impact on our brand that should be fiscal-positive if we can safely assume that, no matter what, Money wants to get out of the situation alive. By which I mean that if the incentives are structured as so that – by believing a set of scientific facts about climate change – we can jointly know (as laid out in contract) that we should have a higher propensity to live should we make A investments over B investments: then we should be playing with those incentives right now (A investments of course being those that go into non-climate change-causing technology). Of course, this is what climate change conferences technically accomplish: what seems to be the problem is that the decisions aren’t flowing through the chain-of-global-command from the top to the operative bottom: where People live and work and lalalaaa life goes on. So maybe it comes down to a language that needs to be learned for operative success to come together.


By the way is it possible, by objectifying our thoughts through our smartphones on to a hard drive somewhere, that we are actually slowing down our capacity for communication? Because if we communicate with a less rapid frequency, we have more time to prepare better thoughts. Or (Better idea): is it that there are varying situations of various types of communication handled with different rates of success given input capacities? Communication: it is a naturally engineered practical art resulting from the impacts of beings sustained over time. And no: it is not easy to get sometimes, and usually that is when it is totally important, or not important at all.

I post my artistic thought with a purpose: it is literally an intelligence-based Internet Shield against the potential that the Internet should be constructed without my thoughts upon it at these present times. You know: like it is for everyone else in their chosen mediums of life-in-action, steered or ridden in – whatever the flavour of the means of the taking part, which we all do from time to time. We shouldn’t always be in action: that sounds like infinity war. Let’s remember that war is defined as masses in action against each other. That’s something that in general we don’t want to be doing, if we all want to live, because otherwise the Planet is going to die, and take us on the slow ride to hell. The fast way into the opposite path is a direct flight to HEL (because we’re not doing any of that shit up here no more). I duly recommend it as a commitment to be made.

© 2019 Jens J. Sørensen

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *