Valuation

Do you know that feeling when you’re staring at a shit-ton of money but don’t have your hands on it just yet? Yeah, I do too ūüôā


I’ve been published in the Financial Times, picture-space included! This is so much more valuable than a Facebook post haha super cool: this deserved a reserve Champagne to celebrate ūüôā

Originally published January 11th, 2019


EDIT:// April 15th, 2019: Quantum gravity. Given that the word quantum means “how much” it is now dawning upon me how obvious it is that this is what it is all about. Valuation, and how much gravity of emotion (and what type) you attach to a whatever you’re perceiving. I am speechless as to how much d’uh (can I say quantum d’uh?) I am feeling right now.

Given a fixed location of perception, physical gravity is a constant. The emotional gravity of what is perceived is a time-dependent variable.

Essentially this turns Physics into an instruction booklet on how to drive your mind. And that is super cool: I can’t overstate how happy this thought makes me, given who I am (a Turner of the Wheel, a Presser of the Pedal). And when you think about it, the obvious sinks in deeper: accelerating with interest, reversing with disinterest, et cetera et cetera.


First objective lessons of valuation, applies to everyone:

I am Me.

You are You.

Most important lesson of valuation right now, in my opinion: Mark Zuckerberg is an Engineering Superhero who simply could not have had any idea about the scale of what he was building when he started building it. There is literally zero reason to project blame on him for anything looking backward: his measure is what he does now and going forward. He needs help in bringing the realm of social media under control – whatever that is going to mean (Mark: I know you’ve been having trouble accepting this, but I am firm and unshiftable on the opinion that the first step is handing over the supply of ID management to Governments – not only I think this. That sets the stage for a lasting base of Earth/Internet co-operation). Attacking him is not going to help. He is a human being. A Father. If you attack something that lives, it will defend itself. Applies to Mark, as well. No: I do not believe Mark Zuckerberg is a Lizard Robot, even though I know there are suspicions amidst all the turmoil. But yes: I would like to see the fictional history epic of the story where Mark Zuckerberg actually was a Lizard Robot that ate the Planet for dinner ūüôā

ps. Even though Matt Damon has been saved so many times from so many situations, they have been imaginary (do you literally seek roles where you must be rescued, Matt?), whereas Saving Mark Zuckerberg is a very real thing and only needs to be done once (hopefully, at least: let’s see what he gets up to in his Days of Old).

By the way, Matt: I really liked that movie where you were small and didn’t go into the Norwegian cult cave. That movie really made me think about the relationship between life on Earth and life inside the Internet. Great piece of art – deserves to be considered as high-class culture alongside all the ancient European shit (which is great.. but REALLY OLD).

pps. on a whole other note concerning matters of valuation: I am only now beginning to let go of the anger I directed at the Physicist Michio Kaku for the diminutive comments he made on the nature of the Cosmos in an interview with Captain Kirk in some documentary I can’t even be arsed to Google. “The Universe is just a symphony..” I invite Michio Kaku to become World Leader in just jokes, to remind us of how grand things of the Cosmos are and how it is not smart to try and compress them into just form.

Diminutive valuation is a form of violence.


Infinite scale as in: the impact of this tool of thought regarding perception is fully dependent on the individual in question using the tool: such as the Elf in this diagram
The Eye of the Needle, building history
Like a bridge between you and the present.

“Equality begins with You. What are your thoughts when your gaze meets another Person, another People?”

“Fusion of matter for electricity creation, as being built at ITER in France, uses the salt water of the Ocean as fuel. Fusion of mind for idea creation, I propose, uses the fresh water of the Lake as fuel: creating an objective, physical evidence for the requirement of hydration for intelligence-creation. So, based on this proposed evidence, should every school student of any age get a water bottle, just like they get a laptop in many places these days? I think yes. I predict good times ahead for all Industries feeding the creation of the Pot, and emptying it.”

“As an Entrepreneur, I believe we must all remember that an idea is like a seed: it is potential life, a path of navigation into the future.”

“As an Entrepreneur, I breathe ideas in through the work of my continued studies into the state of human life, and breathe out the process of selling those ideas to someone: connecting them to a human. Then I breathe in the successful leads, and breathe out the work of making the ideas reality. Basically I’m like a four-stroke internal combustion engine that makes the economy as a whole begin to form from the idea-out.”

The brand-new Oodi Library: yet another reason to love Helsinki.

Valuation is the most objective core of the human mind, the closest-in that we can get whilst remaining in the realm of objectivity: where lies the potential for certainty in agreement between People.

Valuation is what connects us as humans to the world around us, it is what connects us as humans between us, and it is what connects us as humans to our Selves. Valuation guides our perception in the moment: between tasks, between objects, between alternative investment cases of our usage of the time we have as equity in our lives: between whatever and everything: between not caring at all and caring as much as is possible to care.

Valuation is the deepest objective core of thought for – past the conceptual space of valuation where we define our relationships – we enter the realm of the emotions had that create the basis for the existence of the valuation of said emotions, and that is where everyone has their own experience of being, defining the ultimate beginning of the edge of the private sector: the border between our Selves and the outside world. The edge of subjectivity. Valuation, as a conceptual space of thought existent at the very edge of certainty, is objective because we can always talk amongst each other about our relationship with life, which is what valuation – in our subjective use of it – is.

Every day we walk around, we are at least subconsciously valuating our environment. We valuate a green light as we cross the street as the right to cross it safely, and a red light as danger. We valuate a beautiful building that we walk by as the right to feel good about the city that we live in. We valuate the choices we have for lunch and capitalise upon the one we choose to have. Valuation, followed by capitalisation – the taking into use of a valuated “thought result” – leads us into operation, experience, and remembrance: the everlasting process of life itself, enfolding into us with the forces that the world projects out at us and unfolding out of us with the forces the we project unto it.

Whilst psychology looks at human subjects from the outside-in and thus deduces their behaviour from external data, then valuation objectively looks at the world around us from the inside-out and induces our behaviour based on what we perceive. As humans, we are a balance of the community around us and the Self within us. The act of valuation builds a bridge between us and a something, allowing us to discuss our relationship with the something. The act of valuation is like the refinement of our operating instructions, guiding our perception and the resulting senses in the everyday. It is as natural a flow of thought as any other in Nature.

Valuation is what allows us to ask the question: “Why?”

Psychology is a classical science in that it looks at humans outside of the observing psychologist in an objective data-based manner and compares them between each other (comparing a particle of data with the whole set), keeping the psychologists themselves out of the equation for the maintenance of scientific objectivity.

Valuation, on the other hand, is what allows for the other side of the mirror to speak: for the individual human object, the Self that a psychologist is studying, to let the psychologist know what they are thinking and why. Valuation comes from within the Self, and then psychology looks at the aggregate human behavioural results, drawing upon aggregate data to create scientifically justifiable conclusions that can be used to help individuals in their lives – fed back to the Self. Thought of in a way, this is a bit like the relationship between market participant and macroeconomist: data-source to data analyst, creating a discussion about where life stands in the moment that is being had, as viewed by those having the discussion.

The bridge between the observer and the observed can be built directly, human-to-human, or indirectly through the data, human-to-statistics-to-human.


Classical and Quantum Natures

There is an inherent classical and quantum nature to valuation. By classical I posit a needs-based mindset, such as the valuation of water: there isn’t much subjectivity in the valuation of water, since either you drink enough of it at regular intervals or you die. Every force has an equal and opposite reaction: thirst will move you towards water, the body will take control. At the margin of absolute necessities the human becomes comparable to an animal: purely predictable in its behaviour, thanks to the infinite power of the will of life to live and the automating mutations that evolution has provided with us so that, when it comes to necessities, we don‚Äôt really even have to think.

As a side note, I believe that that is why yoga is so powerful for me personally: in that, for example, the taking into control of the breathing is very effective in reconnecting with one‚Äôs body. It is like taking over from autopilot. Thought of in this Yoga First -way, where automations can be taken over from, the human body is much like a vessel that we pilot with our hearts and minds, spirits and souls (and, of course, the contracts that we are signatories of!). Thought of in this way, for me at least, it is also easier to remember “human vessel maintenance”, for who would want to ride upon a non-maintained vessel? 

By quantum, which in latin means how much, I mean a wants-based mindset, such as the valuation of a car: how much added value does a car bring to my mobility requirements in life, as opposed to relying on public transport or walking around the city? In classical arenas of thought there are objectively correct answers (eg. drink water), whereas subjectivity enters the frame once we step on to the quantum side of the consideration of value: when we are not pushed into the margin. The objective value of water is life, the subjective value of a car is convenience: two completely different areas of reasoning, requiring completely different toolsets of thought. All of this is, of course, Person & People, time- and place-specific.

Learning to valuate one’s surroundings is an acquired skill based on the potential for overcoming the experience of living with just necessities. A body and mind that seeks to survive day-in, day-out, doesn’t waste energy on considering what it cannot have: thus the capacity to have hope and dream is what moves such a body and mind forward, whereas the lack of hope is what maintains us in a protective state of holding on to what we’ve got: not valuating the future, but maintaining the present-past.

Hope is a primary ingredient in creating movement, but the world runs on much more than hope, starting with fear and money but also work and joy. The components of building one’s own way forward, ultimately, start with the valuation of one’s own emotions in a pre-Entrepreneurial timespace, however spacious and intense that is for any given individual.

Valuational skill is high valuable: the capacity to perceive, think, and act in moments of varying passing-by speed. The success of work is dependent on the capacity to valuate between the choices available in different situations, for example in being able to choose the correct tools required to perform a task, or to see an existent opportunity as it serendipitously comes into view. In life, we navigate with valuation, in all its different forms across all the different manners of life that there are. Learning how to understand our surroundings is directly correlated with our ability to operate them, and once we get down to the matter of what counts, then it’s the story that we’re telling, the story that we’re selling, as we get to work, that moves us forward.

The story that’s always built on some form of valuation.


The teaching of valuation

At its cleanest level – at its most objective – valuation is learned with the very basic mathematics of classical finance. The values of time and money are combined by discount rates (assumptions of opportunity cost), and with these tools different objects-in-valuation are given a numerical price based on some logical premise, such as a number based on comparable investment options – the practical definitions of opportunity cost. At its most objective – as valuation is being taught now – the numbers of time, money, and interest rates lead the way in determining what is worthy and what isn’t.

Objectivity is maintained purely by the supremacy of the number.

Where the teaching of valuation lacks is that it remains in the classical mindset of needs, where the supremacy of the number can be justified. Overall, in the realm of needs, money and time need to grow – there is no question about that – since that is a sign of the continuous birth of the needs-based economy and tells of the fact that needs are being met.

What the teaching of valuation requires next is the introduction of the subjective, wants-based quantum mindset, where we value targets of desire and determine how much we are willing to work for them. In this realm of thought, we can assume that fiscal losses can be argued as worthy: we can spend ‚ā¨100,000,000 extra on a building, if we wish to make it more beautiful and high-end, for example. We can positively valuate the artistic value of architecture, and the positive value of creating challenging work for the Craftspeople that build it. Past the needs-based Classical mindset, the wants-based Quantum mindset allows us to incept an infinite amount more emotion into the workings of the economy.

The Quantum mindset allows us to make the economy so much better. So much better that I simply lack the hyperbolic expletives to convey the full emotion of understanding its value to us as a civilisation. It allows us to begin truly mastering the growth of value, by understanding what value can mean, in the first place.


To Conclude

To recall the basics of everything quantum, we must remember the simple, Physics-proven reality that two states can exist at once within one thing. That there are two sides to every coin. A euro is a euro for everyone, meaning it is objective in number, but how much it is worth in terms of value is inherently subjective, dependent on who’s talking.

To put it another way, in order to reinforce the point being made above, the nature of money and time are quantum because, whilst they share an objective outer shell, they simultaneously hold within the subjective valuation of what that means for whoever is doing the considering of the objective outer shell in question: whatever it whenever and wherever is. A euro is a euro for everyone, just as a second is a second for everyone, but what meaning or what value we attribute to those objective units of money and time – that is up to each of us as individuals, and we must talk to each other to understand that. Not just through Microsoft Excel, but with actual People, directly, as well. These are like two endpoints of societal analysis.

The calculation of the growth of the number is a skeleton, but we must breathe a deeper understanding of value unto it for the birth of the meat around the bones.

Quantum valuation is all about the teaching of the individual to think for themselves about what they value in life in the moment and across time, so that they may hold the skill of navigating for themselves, instead of being wholly dependent on others: so, in practice, we are considering the progression of Children becoming Adults, capable of thinking for themselves. Aside being a way to understand the nature of individual human beings for the value-creative purposes of business, it is a path for us to understand our Selves and, thus, reinforce our identities and be more comfortable with who we are: to learn to sell our Selves, to our Selves, so that we can function better as part of organisations, where many Selves gather – the better they function together, the better the quality of the value created. We can educate ourselves to be better consumers that serve ourselves, not just the economic machine (which we do, however, wish to service, so that it may continue to serve us).

Ultimately, valuation is where the border between classical and quantum thought lies, and it – the border itself – belongs in the Academic realm of the Market Sciences. We must own this border, for it is what our science is based upon, and it is where we excel, for it is what we have been doing, all along, anyway.

When we valuate, we set the direction. In the Market Sciences, we are navigators.


Some banter follows:

The Quantum Mechanics: We the Salespeople, who make it happen!

The Valuation Slogan: “It’s up to You!”

Pretty much the Aggregate Children-Parents Negotiation?

“From Me through You, on to the Table – the Contract Stew – creating value for the Many, as operated by the Few.”

An idea, now a memory: equity has arrived.
An idea, now a memory: equity has arrived.
Because it is You.

“I’d most like the experience of speaking to Leonardo DiCaprio about the possibility that intertemporal dream-world travel might actually be completely real, and of value. Maybe Elon Musk would be interested in joining that Ring, so that I might understand how that simulation stuff makes sense to Him, and whether or not He would like to come out of it, or not, and whichever way he decides, I’d like to understand his reasoning, nonetheless. Sounds like a great Pot of Idea, maybe worth One party haha”

Liikkellepanijan liikkeiden valuaatiomarkkina huudettu – Ken perustaa? Vai meneek√∂ yli Johtajan yksityisyydensuojan rajojen, laittaa webcamit p√§√§lle? ūüėÄ

“One of my favourite views of Nature would definitely have to be the Moon expunging itself into its Fullest Form, from the pillowy darkness of the night and nightier sky. It is a stirling romance of massive and immassive physical forces, because it could also be looked as the night letting go of a pearl: strong enough to have held something so valuable within, but even stronger in letting it go (knowing it gets to start eating the Moon’s Perfection right away again, after its Full moment of starlight & glory has passed and moved on, beginning to form the next one to be had, in about or exactly a month or so from now, whenever that is).”

“By calculating where the most probable last-place-on-Earth would be for there to be clean water at, and when this last-water event-time should most probably occur, scientists of the Earth could create a really true-to-Earth valuation map for the ultra-long term real-estate investors out there. I‚Äôd buy in to the value of that Map, and its guidance in making fiscal decisions.”

“In Tinder you’re valuating immense mass at swipe-speed. It’s good to realise that every swipe carries the weight of a potential life, and that can mean a lot of things, so preparation on motivationals – before going into the app – is important. Past that, it’s a matter of agreement between individual human beings that is completely natural. If the motivations match, so will the vibes. For safety’s sake, in the future when I myself have kids exploring such ecosystems, I’d prefer there to be a version of the app where log-in and thus ID security – including location – is maintained by a State-level official. If there were cleverness in the State Machine, then they would realise at State-level Leadership that packaging data security services through the creation of an ID object for a Citizen, that is then sold on to for use to different app providers that require a Citizen to log into their services, would be a good Natural business to get into. States should create ID objects to be sold-for-use by service providers. It is my belief that, ultimately, the State should own the market for ID creation & maintenance, and that that is its core function, when looked at purely from the Money-level. I prefer to associate highest levels of trust, required at the core function-level, to State Flags. As a money-operant, I like that sense of stability in a base of Grounded Trust that the State provides, which is what it does when it is providing ID-distribution services.”

Objects, best tools, at the end of the day
Objects: Best tools, at the end of the day
How to Modern Party: Share It Later
Lighter breathing, more beautying
I think Case Weinstein (or any other de-seating of a Leader) gives evidence that is fair enough to be considered as a positive way that Nature works.
Really depends on the Crowd-type One hangs out with.
It would always be my Primary Pricing Base:
how deep do I go into the debt pool, for the view
But dropping the Baby is something that scares me.
Olisiko t√§m√§ sis√§sotilaallinen teko, alivoimaisuustunteet ulosp√§in muille projisoiden? Kun se on tehty kotimaisilla kielill√§, kotimaisilla palvelimilla tarjoiltuna ja kotimaan alueelta kirjoitettuna, kunnioittaako se muiden valtioiden naamans√§ilytyksellisoikeudellista suvereniteetti√§? Vai olisiko (vaativan) kielellisen k√§√§nn√∂sty√∂vaateen my√∂t√§ todettava olevan niin, ett√§ ainoa tapa miten ulkomainen toimija voisi t√§st√§ loukkaantua olisi se, ett√§ H√§nen olisi tarkkailtava Jensin liikkeit√§ ja olla todennut H√§nen sis√§lt√∂ns√§ mielenkiintoiseksi, motivoiden (vaativan) kielenk√§√§nn√∂ksellisen ty√∂n, motivaation olemassaolon todisteeksi sen samalla synnytt√§en. Mik√§li on osoittanut N√§in Paljon ty√∂t√§ seuratakseen Jensin kirjoituksia niin pit√§isi ulkomaisten toimijoiden viimeist√§√§n t√§ss√§ vaiheessa tajuta, ett√§ t√§m√§ on L√§pp√§√§ ja Sen Juurta: kasvamassa kesken√§√§n
Pohjolassa: my√∂s vitusti kaikenn√§k√∂sii ongelmia, ei pelkk√§√§ hevenii.”
Building Cities, pretty awesome stuff if you’re into long-term imagination-work, which in Sales: we do.

“V√§hint√§√§n Ihmisen tulisi olla n√§htyn√§ kysynn√§n Tekij√§n√§. V√§hint√§√§n.

Some Finnish policy (in Finnish)

“Selittelemmek√∂ me itsellemme kehollisten impulssiemme syyt√§ vai selitteleek√∂ kehomme meille miksi niist√§ ei olisi syyt√§ piitata? Tasapaino tuntuu olevan t√§rkein tekij√§ moraalirauhan s√§ilytt√§misess√§, ja kehonhallinnallinen koulutus pit√§isi j√§rjest√§√§ Suomessa asuville ja t√§nne saapuville. Kansallinen joogasubventio voisi tehd√§ erinomaista ter√§√§, my√∂s osana maahanmuuttajien kotoutusta: jooga on ihanan puolueeton ihmisi√§ yhdist√§v√§n√§ voimana ja tekee yhdist√§v√§√§ (v√§hint√§√§n Itseens√§) ty√∂t√§ sek√§ kehon ett√§ mielen tasoilla.”

“Suomessa spesifisti, koulutustarinamme kautta n√§htyn√§, on se vaikea sukupolvienv√§linen crowding-out ongelma taloudessa meneill√§√§n, ett√§ vuosikymmenet ollaan koulutettu nuoria √§lykk√∂j√§ mutta kun sitten tulisi aika v√§isty√§ Vanhana pois tielt√§ ja my√∂nt√§√§, ett√§ olemme itse rakentaneet (koulutuksen ja teknologian my√∂t√§) nopeammin kiihtyneet seuraajamme jotka haluavat nyt ohi, niin sitten pelottaa j√§√§d√§ el√§kkeelle ja vapauttaa sit√§ rajallista johtajuuspinta-alaresurssia nousevien sukupolvien k√§yt√∂lle, joilla olisi kasvupotentiaalia k√§ytett√§viss√§√§n nuoremman i√§n my√∂t√§ enemm√§n kuin Vanhoilla, ja ajankohtaisempi asia- ja ihmistuntemus k√§yt√∂ss√§√§n korkeamman arvopotentiaalin tuottajiksi ja realisoijiksi. On kuin oltaisiin ladattu nuorisomme kiitotielle lentokoneeseen joka tarvitsee kolmannesta pitemm√§n kiitotien noustaakseen turvallisesti: ruuma t√§ynn√§ tietoa mutta ei v√§yl√§√§ mink√§ kautta sen arvoa ty√∂nteon my√∂t√§ rahaksi voisi muuttaa. Pit√§√§ muistaa, ett√§ isompaa muutosta johtava verkostovalta ei muutu digitaalisessa silm√§nr√§p√§yksess√§: se ik√§√§n kuin kasvaa l√§pi kansallistasoisten ihmisjuurten yli ajan, tehden verkostovallasta rajallisen resurssin, monellakin eri tapaa arvioituna. Jos t√§m√§ rajallinen resurssi on el√§nyt liian kauan sukupolvensiirrosvastaisuuden kahlitsemana, niin liiallisen m√§√§ritelm√§n√§ se on alkanut tuhota arvoa sek√§ hetkess√§ ett√§ potentiaali-demotivaation tuoman menetyksen kautta. Loppupeleiss√§ sukupolvien v√§lill√§ vallitseva kahlitsevaisuusaste on m√§√§ritelt√§viss√§ vain organisaation sis√§ll√§, sit√§ kokevien henkil√∂iden toimesta. Suomen kohdalla, viime vuosikymmenten kehityksen saattamana, merkitt√§v√§n koulutusaste- ja samanaikaisen talouden nousukiitokehityksen my√∂t√§ voi mielest√§ni sanoa niin, ett√§ sukupolvien v√§lisess√§ kahlitsevuusasteessa on jotain systeemisemp√§√§ meneill√§√§n, t√§ll√§ hetkell√§.

Sukupolvienv√§liset allokaatiot kansan jokavuotisissa rahavirroissa – eli kuinka paljon jokavuotisesta k√§teisvirrasta pys√§htyy mink√§kin sukupolven edustajan tilille – olisi hyv√§ olla kohdennettuja siten, ett√§ varhais-Aikuisuuden panos-tuotto suhde olisi hetkess√§ arvioituna liioitellumpi: nuoremmille maksettaisiin enemm√§n palkkaa aikaansa vastaan kuin mik√§ heid√§n ty√∂n suora vaikutus on taloudelle, sill√§ sijoitusperusteluolettamalla, ett√§ t√§m√§ olisi toimenpide joka vahvistaisi heid√§n elintasollista asemaansa ja siten vakauttaisi el√§m√§n peruspilarit sellaisiin rakenteellisiin muotteihin jonka varassa kasvaa vakaat kodit (joka puolestaan ennaltaehk√§isee tulevaisuuden kuluja, er√§√§nlaisena kilven projisointina). Perinteiseen hitaaseen palkkanousuun, joka maaduttaa kokonaisia ty√∂el√§mi√§ turhaan paikalleen tai est√§√§ niit√§ alkamasta lainkaan – masentaen kustannusloukuissa el√§vi√§ ihmisi√§ – niin ehdottaisin itse ty√∂el√§m√§osapuolille suunniteltavaksi sellaista j√§rjestelm√§√§ joka toisi nopeata nousua k√§rkeen suoraan koulusta ulostautuessa ja siit√§ rauhallisesti hidastuvaa palkkakehitystahtia l√§pi ty√∂el√§m√§n, kuin auton kiihtyvyyskaaren muotoinen polku. T√§m√§ nopea kiihdytys olisi velanotto nuoremmalta sukupolvelta itselleen, ett√§ raha todella ratkaisisi monen ongelman kodin sis√§lt√§ ulosp√§in, ja vaatisi kuria aiennetun korkeamman elintason hallitsemisessa: Suomen nuoremmat sukupolvet saisivat er√§√§ll√§ tavalla ajateltuna tehokkaamman auton ajettavakseen, ja voimankohotusta olisi syyt√§ kunnioittaa. Oikein ty√∂kaluin – esimerkiksi el√§kerahastoja lainavakuutena Pankeille k√§ytt√§en – voisi Suomen ty√∂el√§m√§ toteuttaa nuorempien, unohdettujen sukupolvien uudelleennousemuksen. Jos heihin – koulutettuihimpiimme – sijoitetaan nyt uskon voimalla lainaa, niin heid√§n vastineeksi tekem√§n ty√∂n pit√§isi kyet√§ maksamaan kyseiset lainat takaisin: korkoineen. Kaikki t√§m√§ olisi loppupeleiss√§ mahdollista, mik√§li Suomen Myyj√§t ovat korkeimmalla tasollaan huippukunnossa: lis√§rahan tekeminen redusoituu aina korkeamman tason myyntitaitoon, voimanhallinnalliseen kykyyn pyyt√§√§ suurempia numeroita. Vaikka se hieman vitsikk√§√§mmin ajateltuna kuulostaa aika h√§rskilt√§, niin meid√§n tosiasiallisesti pit√§√§ laittaa nuoremmat, unohdetuksi tulevat sukupolvemme “myyntikuntoon”. Jotta saamme heid√§t myyty√§ korkeamman tason parempipalkkaisiin hommiin jossa he tuottavat korkeamman tason ainesta myyt√§v√§ksi niin he ansaitsevat kaiken odottelun j√§lkeen etupainotteista korvausta, luottamuksen osoituksena: my√∂s sen takia, ett√§ palkka tutkitusti lis√§√§ itseluottamusta, joka vahvistaa myyntiaineksen laatua entisest√§√§n. Mutta t√§ss√§ Myyntivoimien pit√§√§ kyet√§ myym√§√§n Suomessa tehdyn ty√∂n arvoa: ei kyvyss√§√§n hinnoitella tehokkuustaipumustemme my√∂t√§ itse√§mme halpapeluriksi, vaan itsekunnioituksessamme n√§hd√§ osaamisemme hyvinvointia luova arvo ja asettaa numeromme riitt√§v√§n korkealle, kunnioitusasteemme mukaisesti.”

Sijoitusideoita:

“Ehdotan t√§ten, kiinnostuksen avaruutta kohtaan yll√§pidett√§v√§ksi, ett√§ Lappiin rakennetaan mahdollisimman kalliilla hyper-eksklusiivinen avaruusteleskooppi matkailukohteeksi. Avaruuskokemuksen kuvanlaadun erinomaisuus-todenn√§k√∂isyyden maksimoinniksi kohde pit√§isi rakentaa mahdollisimman kauas Luontoon. Sinne pit√§isi voida saapua korkeimman luksuksen kuljetuksella tai mets√§reitin l√§pi moni√∂isesti patikoiden: ihan miten kukin oman eeppisyytens√§ koskaan sitten hinnoitteleekaan. Itse teleskooppi- ja y√∂pymiskokemus olisi korkeimman arvoluokan kokemus: hotellin palvelutaso olisi Monarkeille sopivaa, v√§hint√§√§n, mutta toivottavasti muunkaltaisillekin T√§hdille kuten Jay Z:lle ja Beyonc√©lle tai Obamojen perheelle. Nautinnollisen avaruudenkatselukokemuksen jokainen yksityiskohta olisi eritt√§in tarkasti suunniteltu, Lapin √§√§riolosuhteiden kaikkien vuodenaikojen erikoisuuksien laatuvaikutannolliset yksityiskohdat suunnittelussa huomioiden, ulkomainen vieraspotentiaali aktiivisesti tiedostaen. J√§nnitt√§vyystasoa laskettaisiin korkeimmalla mahdollisella laatutasolla koska ne suomalaisten avaruusprofessorien tarinat sen avaruuden suuruudesta voi olla v√§lill√§ jopa hieman pelottavia: joten ruoan pit√§√§ maistua, ja sen takia tarvitaan korkeimman laatuluokan ammattikokkeja mukaan t√§h√§n toteutusoperaatioon: koska ruoalla unohtuu avaruus, ja muistuu t√§yttymys. Arvon kasvatus olisi varmasti taattua sill√§ matkojen tuotoksia ne niin sanotut diilit usein ovat: ja kun liikutetaan isoja rahoja, niin luottamusta kannattaa rakentaa isoilla rahoilla. T√§lleen Kansat saavat parhaansa esille. Yksi t√§rke√§ yksityiskohta olisi, ett√§ osana kokemusta rakennuskompleksissa olisi her√§tyskelloja vain varatuille teleskooppi- ja ruokailuajoille: ei mit√§√§n s√§nkyyn liittyv√§√§. T√§ten Suomi viestisi kauniin objektiivisesti, ett√§ Suomessa: S√§nkyyn nouskohon, Ken haluaa ja laskeutukoot sielt√§ kun tahtoo.

“Sitten – heti per√§√§n – haluaisin, ett√§ vastaavan visualiikan laatutason omaavia keskuksia voisi rakentaa kolme enemm√§n: jokainen omana arkkitehtonisena taideteoksenaan, aina siis riitt√§v√§n kauas Luontoon, ettei visualiikan laatutaso k√§rsi. Jokainen avaruuskatselukeskus olisi astetta matalampi laatutasossa matkailukohteena, Prima Donnasta alasp√§in verraten, ja se perusastetason keskus olisi opetuslaitoksen omistuksessa, varmistaakseen sen, ett√§ jokainen suomalaista koulua k√§yv√§ lapsi n√§kisi v√§hint√§√§n kerran alakouluik√§isen√§ avaruuteen (eli jos s√§√§ pilaa yhden matkan, j√§rjestet√§√§n toinen: aina). Sitten olisi my√∂s yksi salainen keskus joka olisi Akatemian yksityisess√§ k√§yt√∂ss√§ ja omistuksessa, tutkimusta ja hallinnollista yksityisyytt√§ varten. T√§ten ennustan rakennusalalle valtavaa buumia l√§hivuosille tai vuosikymmenille – todenn√§k√∂isesti vuosikymmenille, sill√§ en usko, ett√§ valtiolta ihan hetkess√§ n√§it√§ masseja heruu: mutta askel kerrallaan. Hyv√§√§ myyden, hyv√§√§ tulossa.”

Exemplar use of Time Perception: “Finland can think as a sovereign, for that is what we are. I do not consider Finland as part of a warring construct of history between East and West, which destroys significant amounts of potential value that is available to be had for the benefit of all; value that can begin to be created through the construction of the proper international contracts and the subsequent intergenerational deployment of the required operative skill practiced at the highest levels of responsibility and remuneration. I paid attention in geography class, I paid attention in history class. I love both subjects deeply: they form the base of understanding the Market Sciences, which is what I’m all about. Finland is North: Far North, to be precise. The People that live here came from all over the place and have spent the past 11,000 years negotiating with Frost itself. We can carry our own weight. We don’t need Others to scare us – Nature does that for us all on its own.”

The Rings of the Rings

Given that technological advances act as platforms for subsequent advances, all of which impact the state of the State, then it could be argued that the invention of human aviation is the cause of all modern military tensions. Because aviation led to rockets, and ultimately that’s what we’re scared about: because they can get here fastest. Wherever “here” whenever is, that is. So, you know: next time you fly to Timbuktu, you can think about everyone who had to die so you could sit there in that metal tube in the sky, hoping to not die yourself because the Captain goes kookoo.

(By the way, in all seriousness to balance out the above pointed-joke: yes, I am super happy that Science is advancing in the fight against mental health issues and developing better prevention. Whilst not discounting the importance of all the other reasons, then especially for this reason. What happened in the Alps a few years back: that should never happen again.)


The deepest test of any being’s character and form comes not from the departing from the imagination of childhood Рfor that is a realm that a healthy being never departs from, never acting as if that is what adulthood requires Рbut rather from the entrance into the next reality that the path travelled through imagination fuels. It is the entering into the new, not the exiting from the old, that makes the life difference. It is the holding on to of both that builds the full story.

The Ring of Rings – The One Ring, the ring to rule them all – is the ring that is prior to the ring that can be: if the tests of the soul, of the being, and of the spirit are passed on the journeys through the pathways of imagination. It is so that The One Ring is the gateway to all the potential rings that lie in wait for their potential bearer. The rule of The One Ring stems from its guiding power. The path of imagination that The One Ring leads through avails its bearer to the many rings that could be had.

The disposal of The Ring of Rings – The One Ring – into the fires of Mordor is the acceptance of the ever-increasing scarcity of time as the Ages of Old naturally begin to settle into a lifetime. The disposal is the removal of potential in return for the infinitely increased valuation of quality had from the actual that remains, which follows the disposal.

The One Ring is beared by the unattached Person – the Ascendant – holding within it the navigational tools for finding its circular counterpart. Their meeting in the fires of Mordor destroys each other, creating in return The Two Rings.

There comes a time when each bearer of The One Ring, consciously or unconsciously, is called to face the challenges of protecting the sanctity of the ring, as test of moral sturdiness. The sanctity of The One Ring is protected by its timely destruction. The sacred quest of destruction – the killing of the illusion of infinite potential, of infinite choice, brought by The One Ring – creates the bridge that opens the pathway to the realms of the next reality, where The Two Rings and their greater powers are to be had: powers beginning with the nullification of the concept of one ring to rule them all; powers where all rings are created equal.

In the fires of Mordor (recognized on Higher Earth in mediums of love ranging from the local pub to the fierce and extreme environment of Tinder) The One Ring melts itself into The Other One Ring, creating The Two Rings that form the stability of the foundations of the Family that continues life for future Generations to be had.

The construction of the ring is unparallelled in its defensive capacity. It is an arch capable of upholding bridges all around.

The sacred quest of destruction is ultimately had consciously: whilst the immense natural power of The One Ring might lead an unassuming bearer to the ledge overlooking the fires, it will not throw itself in, for The One Ring is a living object and it does not wish to die, just as no other form of life naturally wishes for death when it exists in a state of health. The One Ring must be put into submission. It must be made to understand why its fate is to be destroyed, for that is how it serves its purpose.

The One Ring deserves to die so that it may be born again, carried by the subsequent Generations of bearers.

The natural recognization of and commitment to the higher power and value of The Two Rings over the continued holding of The One Rings is what leads the bearers to have the strength to depart from the illusory allure of infinite potential, of infinite choice. The tossing into the fire is the mark of a risen Ascendant: the stamp of a being that wishes to obtain the irrevocable strengths of higher powers had for the protection of the continuation of life.

The powers of The Two Rings.

So it is that the story of the Twos born out of the Ones
The story of The Rings of the Rings
Are landed here upon this Middle Earth:
The Internet that lays between the Higher Earths of our Planet.


Minä näen Suomen siten, että kaikkien Kansalaisten ongelmat ovat tärkeitä ja ansaitsevat tulla ratkotuksi siinä määrin, missä yhden ongelmien ratkominen ei aiheuta ongelmia toiselle. Kun siis tarkastelen puoluekilpailuun pohjautuvaa järjestelmää Рjonka olen nähnyt sisältäpäin laajasti, laajemmin kuin moni muu Рniin en voi muuta kuin pitää epäoptimaalisena sitä, että loppupeleissä on kyse siitä kuka kykenee ja jaksaa huutaa eniten ja laajemmiten omista ongelmistaan. Tämä aiheuttaa rakenteellista epätasapainoa hyvinvoinnin kehittymiselle, sillä vahvemmat väistämättä kykenevät suorittamaan heikkoja paremmin. Sisäänrakennetut vahvuuserot voimistuvat entisestään kun huomioidaan ajan myötä rakentuneet, kotiinpäin vetävät verkostorakenteet puolueiden takana, imien etuja itselleen kaikkien kustannuksella.

Todellisuudessa kaikki ansaitsevat toimivan järjestelmän eikä nykypäivässä pitäisi enää joutua huutoraitille saadakseen itselleen oikeutta. Suomi on tätä arvokkaampi.

Tämän takia olen avoimesti Monarkisti, sillä uskon meidän saapuneen sellaiseen pisteeseen historiassa missä vakaa ja pitkäkestoinen valtarakenne kykenee tuottamaan jo lyhyellä aikavälillä parempia lopputuloksia Kansalaisille. Uskon Monarkin olevan ylivoimaisesti tasa-arvoisin ratkaisu Suomen johtamiseen ja palvelemiseen. Monarkki katsoo Suomen lipun lävitse kaikkien ongelmia tasa-arvoisesti ja johtaa järjestelmää kokonaisvaltaisella otteella siten etteivät kenenkään äänet jää jatkuvasti ailahtelevien puoluemielipiteiden jalkoihin. Koulukiusatut, vammaiset, vähätuloiset ja yksinhuoltajat: ei heidän kuuluisi joutua siihen henkiseen sotaan mitä puoluepolitiikka on, että he saisivat osansa ja pääsisivät siten elämään rauhassa niine erityishaasteineen, mitä heillä jo muutenkin on.

Ei heidän kuulu alistua missä milloinkin puhaltaville median tuulille, politiikan jatkuvassa rahanmetsästyksellisessä kilpailussa.

Yhteiskunnan ylikilpailullinen nykytila on vakava ongelma jolle on tuotava päätepiste historiassamme. Se aiheuttaa hyvinvointitappioita, ei hyvinvointivoittoja. Suomella ei ole varaa elää siten, että merkittävä määrä julkisen sektorin työntekijöiden suorituskyvystä menee taktikointiin poliitikkoja vastaan ja toisinpäin. Tämä on arjen todellisuus ympäri maata, valtion ja kuntien tasolla: virkahenkilöt vastaan poliitikot, poliitikot vastaan virkahenkilöt. Jatkuvasti ailahteleva toimintaympäristö tarkoittaa sitä, että toimivatkaan ratkaisut eivät ehdi asettua ennen kuin niitä taas hölskytellään sekaisin.

Onko tässä järkeä? Tuottaako tämä hyvinvointia tehokkaasti ja Suomen suhteellisen vähäistä pääomaa kunnioittaen? Vai ylläpitääkö se historiallista sisäisen vastakkainasettelun näytelmää täysin tarpeettomasti? Puolueet vastaan puolueet, puolueet vastaan virkahenkilöt, virkahenkilöt vastaan virkahenkilöt?

Jos voisin niin äänestäisin tänään sunnuntaina huhtikuun 14. päivä, 2019, Suomelle perustuslaillista Monarkiaa jolla olisi säädeltävissä oleva tukeva ote myös operatiivisesta vallasta, etenkin olemassaolonsa alkutaipaleella jossa nykyjärjestelmän sekamelska pitää ottaa vahvasti haltuun. Sillä en voi suoralta kädeltä näin tehdä niin teen seuraavaksi parhaan asian: äänestän tyhjää, joka on yksi ja sama asia kuin vallan ohjaaminen virkahenkilöstöä kohti sillä se vähentää puolueiden mandaattia toimia. Uskon, että kun virkahenkilömme voimaannutetaan ylivaalikaudellisella luottamuksella kehittämään toimintaansa pitkäjänteisesti, niin nykyteknologian varmistamana heillä ei pitäisi olla mitään ongelmia palvella kaikkien ongelmia: ei vain heidän, jotka jaksavat vielä huutaa.

Sillä julkisjärjestelmän tehtävä on toteuttaa yksilön vapautta tasapuolisesti niin näen, että Suomen Monarkilla olisi täydet mahdollisuudet suoriutua tehtävästään objektiivisesti menestyen: kun palvelee siniristilipun kautta kaikkia, eikä puoluevaakunan kautta vain omiaan, jatkuvasti muita vastaan kilpaillen (tappaen mahdollisuudet pitkäjänteiseen keskittymiseen), saa varmasti parempia lopputuloksia kuin mihin nykyjärjestelmä kykenee.

Yhteiskunnan johtaminen ei ole trendien seuraamisen peliä: yhteiskunnan johtaminen on Ihmisten ongelmien ratkomista päivästä, kuukaudesta, vuodesta ja vuosikymmenestä seuraavaan. Yhteiskunnan johtaminen on kokonaisjärjestelmän pitkäjänteistä kehittämistä siten, että ongelmien synty vähenisi ylipäänsä. Ongelmien vähentäminen sotii puolueiden elinvoiman kanssa: mikäli on vähemmän ongelmia, on vähemmän mitä politisoida. Yhteiskunnallisten ongelmien väheneminen on yksi ja sama asia kuin kysynnän laskeminen puolueiden työlle. Nykyjärjestelmässä on siten merkittävä luonnollinen ristiriita tavoitteiden saavuttamisen kanssa, sillä tavoitteiden saavuttajilla on kannustimet olla saavuttamatta niitä.

Todettakoon vielä lopuksi, etten näe puolueiden katoavan vaikka Suomen Monarkia tulisi ja ottaisi ylimmän johtoaseman virkahenkilöstön suhteen. Näen puolueiden vallan siirtyvän lähemmäs paikallistasoa ja keskittyvän siihen mihin heidät on alunperin keksitty: kansalaispalautteen kantamiseen, jotta Kansan ääni voidaan todeta luonnollisesti kuuluvaksi Ihmisten sormista ja suista. Tämä on ikuisesti tärkeätä.

Mutta haluanko nähdä puolueiden vallan vähentyvän valtion tasolla? Kyllä, kysymyksettä. Nykytiedon valossa olen varma, että Suomesta löytyy Monarkin kykyä ottaa heidän valta sillä tasolla vastaan: koko Kansan puolesta, ketään syrjimättä. Politiikka kuuluu paikallistasolle.


The thing about war is that it doesn’t end when it ends on the front: that is when it begins to end. The negative feelings of a mass-fight linger for Generations thereafter through the embedded emotions of Parents being passed down to Children. I think that is good to remember: that chilling out really takes quite some time. The chilling out also won’t happen at the same time everywhere: there must be a Chill Leader.


I once heard a bona fide Jesus of the Money (a higher-level story-teller) in the Banking Ecosystem say that we are all Gods to each other: the interplay of our aggregate skills put into practice through the Markets* (consistent of us the People who carry the equity of the skills) continuously creates the state of the societal reality within which we live.

Inducing from here, I myself find it most understandable that we call the State the State, because that is what it is always in: a state. So the State defines its state, which is us acting out whoever we whenever are. All of this just makes perfect sense to me in understanding how the world works in real-time.

Truly: I really love that Jesus of the Money for bringing a piece of Big God into all of us (we are the Little Ones): for our Selves and for the Collective, defining the aggregate meaning of work (making it all happen).

Jesus of the Money: A True ‚ā¨$¬£¬• of the Coin, a Seller of Sales

*Personally I am careful to note that even Politics is a Market consistent of People carrying the skills of human mass-communication (different, very different from individual-communication): a very important skillset that can be used well or not so much. How I see it is that Politicians carry the arguments of the masses to higher societal dimensions so that common issues can be solved collectively, meaning greater system efficiency.

ps. One great way I’ve found to think about the story of the Jesus of the Money and how we are all each other’s Gods and how astounding the power of aggregate skills is: the next time you’re taking a dump, just look around and think about how much work and learning from across the centuries of technological development has gone into the creation of the pot, the conception of the bathroom tile, the genesis of the toilet paper.. I am so thankful to Humankind across the ages for providing me with one of the most relaxing luxuries of living in modern times, and for the streams and rivers of money that have flown through the People in allowing for the exchanges of skill that made it all possible.

pps. Obviously all of this makes me think about Old Jesus aka Jesus 1.0 (I’m a member of the Evangelical Lutheran** Church: like most Finns) and realize that that Dude actually died for the sins of others. I think the main learning from him is that that shouldn’t ever happen: no one should ever die for the sins of others. Hence the below:

I am not saying Jesus 1.0 fucked up: what I am saying is that his death was a fuck-up. Buuut you know it was 2000 years ago so.. it’s not like I’m carrying any beef against the Romans.

**Evangelical Lutheran as in preach how important it is to work: makes total sense up in the North because if you don’t work, the Winter kills you. So really it’s like an antidote against dying because of your own sins of laziness, which just doesn’t resonate well up here.

¬© 2019 Jens J. S√łrensen

Imperius

This is how you no-supremacy:

“Welcome to the best place on Earth. Earth itself.”


Given that the United Nations is supposed to be a peace building organization, I am simply astounded that they are still supporting and not excommunicating themselves from the World Happiness Report, which competitizes happiness between nations and is pretty much the most horrible misuse of Science that I have ever come across in my lifetime. It is literally the most disgusting thing. It is like a Parent pitting their Children against each other: “You’re not doing so well, Johnny! Sally is so much happier – what’s the matter with you?”

It literally makes me want to puke. The United Nations should not want to make a Citizen of the Planet wish to puke. Thankfully I can find solace in knowing that I am not alone in my sentiments on this matter here in Finland, the “land of the happiest People”. I sincerely hope that the proverbial heads will roll at the UN as the Report is decommissioned and I will do my part in providing feedback as a Citizen so as to have that end met. In the name of global sanity, the World Happiness Report must not be. The United Nations is staring at the lowest point in its history with it, in particular because of the worst fact that the level of spineless culminates in the fact that United Nations releases the report with their brand on it, whilst also adding this:

“The World Happiness Report was written by a group of independent experts acting in their personal capacities. Any views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization, agency or program of the United Nations.”

Does anyone wish to join me in the continued puking? Because to me this looks like the highest organization in the world not taking responsibility for their own actions and, even though I am not a Parent yet, that just seems like an absolutely horrible example to set. Literally Jesus f’in Christ.


I believe the architecture of the mind is the perfect mirror image of Science: it is Science put into practice, for that is how we perceive it. Its best representation is the Internet: into it what we have essentially done as Humankind is capture light. Does that mean that, when we are online, we are inside of a black hole? Is thus removing oneself from Internet usage the same thing as escaping from a black hole? That’s pretty intense!


Love is a game, but not a race. Those are two different things. After the game is over, love is: and that is how it should be.


I’ll be very honest: notwithstanding any considerations on on-going political matters (which I label as the problems of the passing Generations: not mine, of the rising ones), I am impressed by Russian President Vladimir Putin as a Leader and consider him the most on-point Global Head at the current moment in time (Xi Jinping gets close: imagining the challenge of the size and development state of China, combined with the force of the Internet.. holy hell what a challenge that is to even think of!).

I am holding on to one of his quotes very strongly, since I find it extremely practical in building a better world and I feel it resonates with the way I have acted throughout my working life:

“It is not important to project power. It is important to manifest power.”

From the perspective of a Leader, this is a beautiful thought, as it condenses the reality of the fact that the most important role of a Leader is to motivate the Team: to manifest power into them, instead of projecting it at them. That is how you scale the potential of an organization to a higher level, instead of pushing it into submission.

I wish to repeat that this is a comment made completely separate from any considerations of on-going political matters. My opinion on Russia is that they have societal problems and that, since Finland has them as well, there is a lot of potential to create value by solving them together as neighbours (you know, which we irrevocably are): primarily by deconstructing historical military tensions that made sense then (but simply do not do so anymore: I know all about these feelings changing through time as I have grown up through a deeply-entrenched Air Force-based Family) and then by going all-in on using IT to raise the productivity of the public system so that we can construct both climate and fiscal sustainability, which are fundamentally interlinked.

My opinion on the problems of history is that no one is to be blamed for their being: they are, and the best way to approach problems is not denial, but acceptance. That is the way forward, not backward. As a relatively traditional, conservative but allowingly-liberal Person (to have a right to my privacy, I give it to others: because logic, it just makes sense), I’d like forward-motion because to be honest my ultimate dream is pretty basic for a Man: Wife, Family, Home, Work, Hobbies, Nature.. Peace. So, you know, I’m being open about all this because I think that openness can really help build a better operative environment for my life, instead of staying quiet and hoping someone else might come and do it.


“I am coming to be of the opinion that money is a bona fide human sense. Otherwise, it simply makes no sense: and I am not of the opinion as a living being that the securing of my livelihood should function under circumstances of pure coincidence. Humans can acquaint themselves with and learn from their senses: money fits right in to that picture. Thus it must naturally follow that time is, as well, a sense: the logical functionality of money requires that it be so, since money cannot function without time. The combined sensing of both – a true quantum act – is what builds the potential that leads (potentially) to the creation of value.”


“I am a Man of the Market. This means that I look at the news media in a very different way than most People. When I see People with problems that I have an inkling of an idea on how to solve, I work on it and reach out. It is called marketing and, if a message catches on, then begins the sales push. Put directly: the media is my source of demand. There is nothing special about that. That is how it is for everyone: the problems for solving and subsequent creation of value have to come from somewhere, whatever the media is: a newspaper or the local pub.”


“Mit√§ tapahtuisi Suomen politiikalle mik√§li vaaleissa tyhj√§n √§√§nest√§minen merkitt√§isiin virallisesti √§√§neksi virkahenkil√∂iden vallan lis√§√§ntymisen puolesta? Sill√§ sit√§h√§n se on, laskiessaan puolueiden johdollista mandaattia. √Ą√§nest√§m√§tt√∂myys, joka on valinta itsess√§√§n, on taas k√§yt√§nn√∂ss√§ vallan siirto t√§ysin pime√§√§n. Minut on ymp√§ripuhuttu √§√§nest√§m√§tt√∂myyden sijasta tyhj√§n √§√§nest√§miseen: haluan v√§hent√§√§ puolueiden valtaa ja antaa sit√§ virkahenkil√∂ille. Mielest√§ni heid√§n ammattitaito ansaitsee lis√§√§ hengitystilaa suorituskyvytt√∂milt√§ puolueilta. Todettakoon itsest√§√§nselvyyksien pyhyyden nimiss√§, ett√§ puolueiden suorituskyvytt√∂myyden ei ole tarpeellista olla luonnontieteellinen vakio: on kyse el√§m√§st√§ ja siit√§, ett√§ joskus ratink√§√§nt√∂ on reilassa ja joskus ei.

Virallistamalla mahdollisuuden √§√§nest√§√§ virkahenkil√∂iden vallan puolesta saa yhteiskuntaj√§rjestelm√§ lis√§√§ hengitystilaa ja mahdollisuuden v√§litt√§√§ Kansalaisten mielipiteit√§ todellisuuteen merkitt√§v√§sti rehellisemmin. Onko sitten OK sanoa siten, ett√§ n√§en Suomen virkahenkil√∂t Jeesuksenani: jos sille olisi joskus t√§ydellisen rahakadon my√∂t√§ minulla tarve, kyll√§ min√§ uskon heid√§n tulevan pelastamaan. Onhan se nyt kuitenkin heid√§n sopimukseen sidottu ty√∂ns√§*: Jeesustella p√§iv√§st√§ toiseen. Suokoon heille siihen paremmat mahdollisuudet ja √§√§nestet√§√§n tyhj√§√§.”

*Suomen Holmstr√∂m sai jopa Nobel-palkinnon todetessaan √§lykk√§√§sti, ett√§ sopimukset ohjaavat Ihmisen toimintaa. Hitto soikoon mill√§ itsest√§√§nselvyyksill√§ niit√§ palkintoja tipahtelee! Kaikella kunnioituksella siis Benkulle tottakai: monella tapaa ajateltuna olen se Ihminen kuka t√§n√§ p√§iv√§n√§ olen spesifisti ja suoraan h√§nen henkil√∂kohtaisesta ansiostaan. On syyt√§ muistaa, ett√§ koko Suomen startup scenen buumi sai alkunsa Bengt Holmstr√∂min sanoista suomalaiselle Aalto-opiskelijaporukallemme syksyll√§ 2008, kun vierailimme h√§nen luonaan MIT:ss√§. Jos joku ihmettelee, ett√§ mist√§ min√§ olen ponkaissut: sielt√§, h√§nen luotaan.”


“Do you want to know what can make you think? It is always said that there is a certain population: 7.5 billion on the Planet. If you put that into motion and remember that that means 7.5 billion human lives are in the process of being lived – that many stories being told – then you can have a more sensitive touch on matters of quality of said lives. Then you can consider whether or not there would be more or less turmoil if the quality were higher, because opportunity costs: they exist. All of this can make you think.”


For me, pure love is the absence of projection: the tranquility of being. That is not to say that projection (work) is not fun and lovable! It’s just that the word pure is key to understand.

The Finnish word for violence is “v√§kivalta” which, literally translated, means mass/group- (v√§ki) power (valta). Think about that.


Understanding the basic concepts of interpersonal power is not difficult when they are related back to Earth through the Wizarding World. The Imperius Force, which governs strongest over the realm of interpersonal power exchanges, breaks down into three palatable components:

1.) Imperius Spell: the voluntary subjugation of another Person into One’s control (Muggle-comparable: having superiors at work, control based upon (an) objective contract(s) of rights and incentives. The spell is not a weapon when used well.

2.) Imperius Curse: the involuntary subjugation of another Person into One‚Äôs control (Muggle-comparable: slavery, control based upon fear of violence and other disincentives). The curse is a weapon (often resultant from poor spell-usage), and there are obvious reasons it is unforgivable. Avoiding usage of the curse begins by understanding the meaning of the phrase: “When it is serious, always teach: don’t preach.”

3.) Imperius Field: One’s media-projection of information at the masses. Whilst the spell and the curse are directed at individuals one at a time (at faster and slower rates dependent on Wizarding proficiency), the field is directed at groups simultaneously (the size and strength of the field projected as also dependent on Wizarding proficiency). The field can be a weapon and not a weapon, depending on the individual reception of the People within the audience group. Usage and reception of the Imperius Field in public is actively monitored by the authorities.

The Imperius Barrier, the source of the Force, is constructed by oneself around oneself as life goes on. The construction of an Imperius Barrier (which Muggles call ‚ÄĚthe ego‚ÄĚ) is a function of the effort put into the finding of oneself‚Äôs strengths and weaknesses, thus increasing the capacity to know how oneself can best utilize and develop oneself‚Äôs reserves of the Imperius Force. The quality of the Imperius Barrier ends up correlating directly with the power of One‚Äôs capacity in utilizing the Imperius Force: indeed, the construction of the Barrier is what shows the beingness of the Force to be held. It is an absolute prerequisite.

Imperius‚Äô growth and progress amongst Individuals naturally tends to result in the formation of a Multimperius Combinatorial: a Barrier of Barriers. The Multimperius Combinatorial is a result of the combination of several Imperius Barriers into one, through which the Multimperius Force is jointly used by the leadership of those residing within the Combinatorial. The birth of a Multimperius Combinatorial happens through a ‚ÄĚpower storm‚ÄĚ of individual Imperius components coming together from their carriers, and is always a sight to behold – especially from within.

As it is built, the Multimperius Combinatorial avails itself to the same three components as the Imperius Force, but on a higher dimension of human being. It creates a ‚ÄĚhuman of humans‚ÄĚ: an organization, embodied into the Multimperius Combinatorial. Muggles refer to a Combinatorial, for example, through their discussion of corporate brands.

To close, let us remember that the relationship of Parents and Children, in the consideration of the Imperius Force (its strength and outcomes) is hotly debated and contested daily in many Family Homes around the Planet. This is a truth that will never be forgotten, because it is as real as it gets.


EDIT:// April 11th, 2019: I do not think Facebook is the primary online concern. Before we talk about Facebook, I think we really really really need to start talking en masse about Tinder and its comparables. There’s.. there is something I find really really really questionable about it, from a mental health perspective, given that it combines extreme mental speed (swipe speed) with the most infinite (and thus slow) mental mode of life: the seeking of love. Based on my own experiences in whittling myself down to the minimum (maximum 2-3 matches at a time, publicity turned off until a match drops. I call this Phoebe’s Law, based on the Friends episode where Phoebe has trouble dating two guys at once – I literally think breaking Phoebe’s Law is the fastest direct way towards insanity for the otherwise healthy) and removing the strength of the swipe-addiction, and watching the compulsive behaviour of People close to me, I’d say Tinder and its comparables are the most real mass-threat arising from the Internet right now. I think it is fucking People up big time and super fast, and the swipe-based love industry needs to be regulated ASAP. We must remember that even if on Facebook People are selling themselves against the revenue brought in by advertisers, then on Tinder et cetera People are literally selling themselves: they are the advertisement, on that very specific level.


Church has been the social media of the ages, all through ages past. I believe the central power enticing the gathering in God’s house is the presence of others, present there to form and continue to reaffirm a world view alongside the others: building trust that One is not alone in how the world is perceived. Much like going to the gym is like filling up the tank on physical energy, then going to Church is filling up the soul and spirit.

The mana, so to say.

Is the digital social mediasphere of the modern day a Church where People go to fill up and rejuvenate? I would say that it was to start with, but judging by the incessant increase in news against social media platforms, I fear it is becoming a dirty pool of social addiction that will be cumbersome to clean up once the bottom cracks and spills the People back to Earth.

The reason that the cracking open of social media addiction is something that I have a bona fide fear for is that it is such an intense group affair across the spectrum. The effects are Planet-wide. Even though addictions are always negatives, by their definition as a word (the opposing positive direction being additives), then social media gone bad is a group addiction that makes its bringing into control seem like an impossible feat due to its size. 

There have always been People who fear or otherwise cannot handle being alone: who naturally seek the company of others at a heightened rate and become dependent on them. It is natural. I am the exact opposite of this type of Person, having grown up through such a life path that my sense of individuality has always been strong and remains uncompromised. That being said, first resisting and then ultimately breaking free of the gravitational pull of the group pressures of social media has probably been the greatest challenge of my life.

I have only come to understand recently that the pull of a good Leader is to quite literally be the centerpoint of gravity within a group: like a human magnet. More specifically, I have come to notice that that means that the Leader is the definition of Individual for the group and, as such, I’ve come to notice how good Leaders are able to hold their own and not lose themselves in the pressures of the light of publicity, whereas failing Leaders cannot keep their head on straight and seek backwards into the dark. The strongest are the Ones who admit their incapacity and step aside.

This raises some very interesting viewpoints concerning social media and the groups structures inherent within. Who is actually following who? Who is leading? Or are the platforms effectively war rooms for self-advertisement: venues where Individuals go to measure their clout for whatever reasons? Or are they escape rooms from reality that People can’t escape from, because they’re lonely at home and even the cold digital haze of connection is better than spending time with One’s own thoughts?

Social media seems to be distorting some natural behaviours through their amplification, making us socially ill when off of the platforms even if our projected perfection on them looks.. “perfect”. For example, People give other People likes because they fear that, if they don‚Äôt, no one else will. Caretakers of good will, a most natural part of groups, take it upon themselves to like through all of the posts in their network. Though well-intentioned, this accelerates into a loop of non-substantial air: there is no meaning behind the actions other than fulfilling a natural behaviour, the worth of which has become diluted through its inflation. Caretakers are angels, but can also turn quickly into overbearing fakes.

So, let’s go back to Church. If People used to play the mass social game at a weekly tic, then now that game is being played at the frequency rate of however often the smartphone is being picked up. If Church allowed for storylines in friendship that spanned years and decades, then social media’s constitution of friend or follower is the exact opposite: the insight of moments and seconds constitutes connection. The sharing of stories at a weekly frequency left room for connective depth, the perpetual ping rate of social media leaves connection in a purgatory of continuous non-alignment. The function of depth is to foster a sense of trust that naturally brings alignment to the emotions had and energies transmitted between People.

At its core, the matter is simple: social media is the biggest question mark of our time.

What makes the situation scary are the group effects I discuss above. Removing myself from what I deemed a harsh and unhealthy environment was literally like ripping my head off of a magnet to save myself from what I began to perceive quite directly as Smartphone Zombiedom (nightmares included): so strong is the force of social power, the acceptance through congruence.

If I am strong-willed (of which I have much proof) then how easy is it for those weaker than me to do the same? Playing forward on this string of thought, then how many Prisoners of life does social media carry: those who are there for the “group” that is but would not wish to be, nonetheless staying because the fear of the dark outside is stronger than the fear of the cold light inside of the digital social group?

I look at the situation from the outside already, from what I perceive as the warmth of the dark of Nature. From here, it is currently nearly impossible to see the future past the current position: does there begin an exodus of Individuals culminating into a 50/50 societal split that would be much like the Black Mirror -episode presenting a social media dystopia? Or does social media suddenly solve all of its problems and turn into digital happyland? Or will the regulatory system simply shut the whole thing down in the face of systemic health fears? I simply can’t discount that option from actualizing, given that academic research on social media-induced health problems are only beginning to gain traction. What happens following the unfurling of whatever outcome is so deep in the dark that it is impossible to say: whatever it is, then a ride back into Nature, it will be, for that is what it will become.

The latest Government-hatred of Facebook, for example, comes from New Zealand in the wake of the shootings in Christchurch. The UK has been leading the charge for a few years already. Germany pushes at the forward-front of privacy protection.

The question is: will it all lead us to a 2020s where we are picking up the pieces from total social media destruction after some catalytic event? Or will it lead us to a decade where we peacefully see that there are two forms of Human: digitally social (fast) and naturally social (slow)?

At this stage, it is impossible to know. The show is only just about to start. My hypothesis is that global players will disappear from the industry and that local ones will take their place. For example, a digital social media that is born out of a City, for a City, is likely to be infinitely more tied into cultural context, and therefore holds the prerequisites to be a much healthier organism that can sustain itself across time. It is hard to see this happening for Facebook or Instagram, for example, because they and their Leaders are so intensely far-removed from home. 

That matters. Even if the generic IT industry expert will continue to focus on the tool and that it can be scaled across the Planet at minimal cost, then the reality of the matter is that the human connection in business is always there. The ecosystem that is a social media dies if it is not led well: just as a Priest will lose the flock if the preaching becomes a leeching of the time.

The Dotcom bubble of two decades ago happened with the Internet browser as the media platform. The smartphone platform might be on the verge of leading us to something similar. It has grown so fast that it has centralized leadership into extremely condensed locations (naturally so, as the first winners of new ecosystems will always emerge, by definition).

My only hope is that the peace wrought from base levels of assumed privacy is returned to society: where a gathering of friends is no longer a product for the Chosen One of Social Media to share to others digitally, but actual life to be lived.

I have a hard rule under my roof: ‚ÄĚTake the pic, but share it later.‚ÄĚ My home and my being are not to be whored out to your other friends. I don’t give a rat’s ass about the advertising money flowing through: I have become so desensitized to advertising across my life that I literally do not even notice that it exists. What I care about, and why I left social media, is the sanctity of being: the cozy comfort of privacy. The behaviour of others matters in its preservation, and forms my base of motivation in what I consider to be work in the very fundamental preservation of society.

This is by far the hardest subject area for thought present on our Planet at this time. Prior to the professionals doing the academic labelling, it is very hard to point at social media and say “disease” like the politicians in the UK. I do, however, understand their sentiment strongly. The reactions of those opposed to these politicians, in my view, is evidence on behalf of the politicians: this piece, for example, lights up my Insanitometer quite strongly.

I hope I have been able to communicate my points effectively and wish for the continuation of a civilized conversation.

My tips are the following: smartphones and the communication mediums that exist within them are tools used to navigate oneself into situations lived in reality. Being stuck inside the smartphone is like driving on an infinite highway. Finding the offramp takes time and begins with the adjustment of behaviour to make sure that more social interaction is being had offline than online. That is the definition of social health for me and it will be the most central function of the education that I give to my own Kids in the future, if social media is still around (which, I believe, it will be – as localised, not as global).


The truth is that, within a society, all the times are happening all the time. What is a time of joy for one will be a time of angst for another. That is why the best societal leadership strategy is logically not to try and foster too strong illusions of an effervescent unity of being: it is also to keep People structurally separate (by ensuring their Individual freedoms are not compromised, and that they’re not forced into undesired contact) and allow them to come together on their own through whatever forces of Nature guide the formation of social constructions. This allows for a society to remain objective and not infringe upon the sovereignty of the Individual: it is the avoidance of the Imperius Curse, so to say.

The correct path forward becomes maximal objectivity of the State, in my opinion. In practice, the definition of a State reduces down to the palette of services offered (products, even), the prerequisites for their acquiring (beginning with Citizenship or Residency or International Contract of Provision for Visitors), and the time within which a Citizen has the right to be fulfilled. There is nothing more objective on Earth as time: therefore, if time targets are not met, there are born the justifications for more authoritarian rule of civil bureaucracy to get things in order.

What ensures an objective outcome is so simple that it empties all doubt: measurements. What you measure is what you get. In Finland, for example, politics does not seem to understand this at all. That shouldn’t come as a surprise: even private sector leadership has started to focus on more refined operative measures only during the past decade or two. The emergence of IT has allowed for this: the access price to data has dropped so much that Leaders can now be much more knowledgeable than before.

It is like I have said: if a Government is viewed as flying a massive societal ship around the Sun, year after year, then IT makes it possible to have an updated instrument panel. Ask any pilot and you will find that that makes all the difference in safer, higher-quality flight: information in, measurements out, actions forward. That’s how a Captain flies.


Ray Kurzweil says: ‚ÄúOur intuition about the future is linear. But the reality of information technology is exponential, and that makes a profound difference.‚ÄĚ

I think this type of statement concerning the nature of time needs to be made much more carefully, and without the use of the word but. There are two sides to it: our body moves linearly from year to year – the physical timeline circles us around the Sun. The other side, what I think Ray Kurzweil is referring to with the exponential reality of IT, is that as something new enters the frame, it will grow until it has completed the infinite acceleration and become a normal part of life. I think what Ray Kurzweil, and a lot of other IT industry Veterans (who should be treated as such), is suffering from is speed-blindness: there has been so much new stuff throughout their lifetime that they’ve gotten stuck in a precognitive state where the brain’s assumption is that this will just keep happening.

In turn, I think the reality is that there is only a certain speed at which a human being can digest information and move its body. So, even if computers might be however infinitely fast, the human being can still only digest a certain amount: definitely not a static figure, as all individuals are different, but that amount is definitely less than infinity.

ps. there was a slightly more aggressive note here previously, directed at Ray Kurzweil: I apologize if it was blunt. It’s been quite a stress on my brain to figure all of this IT/Earth relativity stuff out. I think we’re getting there: IT is the brain/mind, Planet is the body/soul, their interactions “breathes” in and out, fuelling the projection of our spirit into the future that guides us towards it. That’s how I think of it all, at least, and I think I am getting the handle on being a human being in the Digital Age. It all starts with a global perspective: otherwise it is impossible to live with the Internet – if you can’t accept that everyone isn’t like you, you can’t stand the information that proves it.


On mielestäni nähtävä asia niin, että valtaosa yhteiskunnan sisäisistä ongelmista kumpuaa niin sanotusta sosiaalisesta sodasta: heikon itsetunnon omaavien Johtajien jatkuvat pyrkimykset mitata itseään muita vastaan sen sijaan, että heitä autettaisiin kohtaamaan itsensä johtaa siihen, että vastakkainasettelut kasvavat sisältä ulospäin. Mielestäni nämä pimeyden soturit jotka eivät kykene huomaamaan kyvyttömyyttään hallita valtaa pitää pelastaa Рitsemme vuoksi, mutta tottakai myös heidän. Ketään ei pidä ikinä koskaan syyttää siitä, että on uskaltanut nousta vastuuasemaan. Päinvastoin: yhteisön palvelemisesta pitää kiittää, samalla kun vetäisee heitä sieltä asemasta pois, satuttamasta itseään ja muita.

¬© 2019 Jens J. S√łrensen

Be The Pie

Here is my hard opinion on homosexuality, which I’ve really worked with to understand what’s up with it all: it has to exist. Without Nature providing even the slightest little capacity for physical affection towards the same sex, how could a human being be turned on by themselves? I find that is really important, to be able to love oneself even in that way, because – you know – you are you and you are great. So I think I’ll declare openly that I am the tiniest teaspoon of queer: just enough space to focus all my Man-love towards towards myself, so that I can utilise the energy that that creates towards the Ladies.

Who knows: seeing this might be the source of my mojo, baby.

And once again for the sake of the obvious: I believe in People’s freedom to be who they are, as long as privacy is respected. The above is my way to make sense of the being of my opposite: with the sense I can accept and let go, and not have to think about matters beyond my concern. I’d like to close by saying that, even though I simply cannot imagine it in any way whatsoever, there is something beautiful about the love that People of the same sex share for each other, since it exists completely irrespective of Nature’s requirement for reproduction and, therefore, depicts a different realm of the purity of connection. I trust that there exists a mutual respect amongst and between the different forces and forms of love that be.


Käytännössä ainoa tapa ratkoa Ukraina on se, että Pohjoinen muodostuu kiilaksi Idän ja Lännen välille jotta vanha historia saadaan viimein lopetettua ja uusi aloitettua. Pohjoinen on luonnollinen raha- ja tietovirtojen välittäjä pitääkseen nämä historioittensa myötä suuresti eri tavoin ajattelevat ilmansuunnat erossa toisistaan. Pohjoisella ei ole intressejä eskaloida mitään: meillä on jo Talvi jota vastaan taistella.

Some People might wonder about my creative process. There are several ways, the primary one being that I have transferred my social media -oriented thumbspeed potential to Notes (meaning: since I do not use social media anymore, I have redirected the physical strength of my typing, so as to not waste equitable resources, towards jotting down my ideas for myself). Based on a note I have saved (like a tweet for myself) I might expand it into a full text: the main point with Notes is that into it I create my own supply of potential to draw upon. If I don’t expand a thought, I might just post the random strings of strings of ideas like on some of my messier posts (like a tweet-flow).

I also tend to work directly online – like being a Painter working out in a public area, it allows me to view the reality in real-time – because it increases my focus on finding the balance of pushing the limit of the thought and securing the integrity of my brand (so saying what I want to say and getting just the right amount of emotion in, but cutting the fine edge so that I don’t feel I am creating any fiscal risk for myself due to any negative impacts on brand of my writing publicly about how I see the world). This is actually like my virtual driving style, where I max-in on braking zones and slow down corner by corner as I find the correct spot (so: there is a spot where you are supposed to brake, when learning it you either brake earlier because you’re going past the spot or you brake later because you’re slowing down before reaching it – the point is that you’re always working towards the correct spot): like posting a text and then starting the race against time to edit it so that it can actually keep standing on my website – working towards the spot.


I’d just like to say up front that I am a huge Barack Obama fan: I just really disagree with him on this one dumb point he keeps making:

Barack Obama keeps speaking about the Planet being so small for our Generation, because he is comparing the increasing pace of information- and mass-transfer from the perspective of having been born in the 1960s. So it makes sense that he sees the world as having shrunk (because of constantly increasing ability-to-travel culminating in White House -service level = at-top of market peak), but what doesn’t make sense is the direct projection on to a younger Generation that he simply can’t have any full knowledge of the understood state of, even if he has got a pretty good ear. Barack Obama saying “the world has gotten smaller for you” is his view on how we perceive it: but we are a broad group.

So I am here to help Barack have more of it (sense), by adding my own bit of it into the Internet Porridge for him: I was born in 1987 and grew up mostly internationally through to my late 20s (Finland, UK, Silicon Valley, Beverly Hills, Denmark, NYC, San Francisco). Then I worked in business and started to see the Planet as an object from which you extract money: I had a saying “same ass, different seat” that kept my head set on fast-going journey paces. But I made good money, which I’ve mostly lived on since then, so the pace was worth it. But so, more towards the point: one side effect of having grown up world-in (international-to-settled Human-state change) is that I actually grew up into seeing the exact opposite as you, Barack (if I may go direct-to-First). I grew up seeing more and more of how different we are from a close range-in, having been dipped into a wild variety of different sources of thought and ways of being and working. 

Even though your record-of-diversity from Youth is good, it is different than mine – which is also good (Golf whisperer: a demonstration of finesse in diplomatic capability, maintained equality in valuation, so subtle, the finest tinge of “look: Bro” hidden in the manners…).

Mine is looked at from a Far North -perspective: born in Finland, raised half-Danish: practically full-International, early-dipped into Adulthood and resultantly fluent in moneyspeak.

I think opposite to you because even my well-cultured and -travelled personal feeling is that I have been subjected to too much Human on some level: therefore my main, clarifying outcome of this is that I do not agree with you: simply by way of a difference in perception. There are many things that go into it, but I simply can’t accept the premise on any front that the world is small.

The Sea, the Land, the Air, the Planet (and especially the Everythingness of the Cosmos beyond it): it is all very huge!

There is a very important reason as to why I am making this openly-stated projection of the energy of thought towards you: it can prove to Academia and Everyone else, as an important top-level conversation-shifting turning point, that differing perception-in-thought exists regarding how big the world is or is not seen as. I think this difference in perception (ours) is important because it awakens a lot of questions regarding the present and future state of society.

For example: how do the Older generations understand the current state of technology and its societal impacts? How do the Younger generations understand the current state of technology and the direction it is driving us in? Our relationship across time with technology plays a significant factor in causing our directional separation in understanding regarding how big or small the world is, because it is what guides our ability to perceive it.

If I look at the world as big, does that mean that I can‚Äôt compress my thinking into not seeing the fundamental differences that exist across human societies because of their significant cultural histories, all of which form the emotional mass of their ever-continuing societal movements? History is very much not dead: it is completely alive. It guides our decisions every day and in the everyday. Looked at another way: because this is how I think of the world (realising the living emotions in the histories), then I think of the world as very big. I know what I am saying flows a bit funny but it makes sense: trust me. I promise you that you can, on the weight of some very familial things that I know you also respect very much.

And that is why I think that many things, that People and Leaders should now be wanting to accelerate, might actually be wanted to be decelerated: because that would allow for the time to think about not just how big the Cosmos is (setting the big picture), but how huge the Planet and the Humankind upon it are (zooming into the hugeness of the reality), as considered from the beauty of our differences (that naturally separates us into Communities and Niches, the “quantum particles” of Civilizations).

Might I just say: one other reason I understand the breadth of Humanity is Tinder. You can just really find some different places in society from there.

A further reason why I think this projection of energy is important: because the difference in perception between us leads to differences in opinion regarding operational matters and the words used to convey them. I’d start talking about natural separation as well, alongside the natural coming together. It’s like a breath going back-and-forth and when the winds of change arrive, their words need to be spoken. The People who live closer to home and see the world as bigger than those who constantly travel it: they need to be remembered in the rhetoric. Now the jetsetting suits are guiding the action overbearingly: too much.

If you ever want to talk, here’s my preplanned and posted opener (pretty much all I have to say after the above, but I guess we can talk about birdwatching afterwards or whatever: if it is that we were to someday co-exist in a co-located slice of space-time with enough slack in its calendaric construction that we should have exchange-potential to spare for the birds):

“Barack. Look: the world as a whole is an interconnected system of many networks of decision-makers controlling and deploying the capital they have stored in their equity-well. You speak into these networks, and I feel you might be on the wrong communications strategy towards them in helping them shape their thought.

I think you should speak about how BIG the world is, making it more wondrous. This includes discussing the relationship between our natural separations, as well as our natural connectedness. The Planet is shared, the Cultures are owned: we all carry them. I think getting the Youth to understand these things at scale – having been brought up in the smallness of the digital world, instead of the breadth of Nature’s reality: it might be just the correct balance for them. I think it is important to know that travel time does not equate to bigness or smallness. It equates to how fast you can arrive at the different: it will still be different, no matter what speed you get there with.

Another reason why I think this is a better communications strategy is that it will get leaders to think about respecting their counterparts more and on a deeper level: not just focus on how similar they are on the surface because they’re all there wherever they are to make money. There’s nothing wrong with that: what’s important is that there is also cultural interchange. That makes things healthier: full stop.”


John Nash created a great game with the Prisoners’ Dilemma. But we should not refer to his numbers and logic stuff as “Game Theory“*. There is not simply The Game Theory. There are many games that can be imagined/ideated, designed, built, played, enjoyed, despised, analysed, mused upon, strategized around, dreamed towards..

Nash brought us A Game Theory. Let us call it Game Theory Origin, in my opinion, at least. I’m calling dibs on holding the definition (since I’m about to do it) of Game Theory Continuation, which is that there are an infinite amount of games: as many as there can be situations in which they are played by however many People or Beings or whatever.

The solution to Nash’s Prison is realising that you can always get out of it by remembering the other solutions (to game design, that is). Nash’s solution in teaching us about the being of games was to create a situation where you have to choose between betrayal and loyalty (and assumptions of another’s thinking regarding them, as related back to you in the situation). It is a pretty ultimate situation and thus it calls for ultimate solutions, depicted as existent within the logic of his work: the characters built into it being faced with prison time. Prison time, the prospect of it, is a pretty intense factor in my action-pricing function: thus I work against it in the construction of my knowings about how to act. Therefore, I need other games than prison games, to build the knowings that go in the other directions: away from the prison games.

So there are many other situations that require less ultimate solutions: or are there? Or do all games always reduce to betrayal and loyalty? If so, what would be a method of avoiding the resulting state of continuous pressure? Not playing games all the time, to start with. Then not taking them too seriously.. realising solo situations without entanglements to others.. there are so many things showing how limited Nash’s perception was. With all due respect for him, he took one step into games.


If you really want to understand intergenerational diplomacy at the highest levels of sensitivity, imagine an older-than-average new Father of a young Girl that is also a high-ranking & well-accessed General who starts to answer questions about their job to their utterly-curious Daughter when the Girl turns around five or so. That’ll teach you a thing or two about the discussion of balance and its necessity for the holding: Kids talk to each other in daycare. General doesn’t want to be a leak – or too much of a pussy to have a song.

This is a Finnish example, for good objective measure, of A General’s Song: (it’s always good to have comparables, so I thought I’d provide):

No annapas minä Tyttöseni
Kerron sinulle homman
Kenraali kävelee toimistolla
Käytävää pitkin
Kunnon Kenraalilla ei ole Matoa otsas!
Kulkee hymyssä suin
Ja selkä suorana

Minä näytän esimerkkiä kulkiessani
Minä näytän esiesiesiesiesimerkkiä!

Minä näytän esimerkkiä kulkiessani
Esiesiesiesiesiesiesiesimerkkiä.

Generals: I mean to be multimedia-friendly 2019: you gotta have a song. Maybe you can upload one to TikTok haha this was just an idea I can’t force no one to do anything but wouldn’t it be so 80’s “we are teh world”? ūüėČ Hearing it from the Generals that work is being done to keep them safe might be a good communications strategy on a Child- and Teen-heavy platform: where it can potentially get depressive and let’s remember that there are Young People that think about big things early so you know: wherever you can spread the feeling of security with your presence, I guess it might have some value to someone out there somewhere – who knows I’m just speculating but you know given the size of the numbers of the masses there really is probably bound to be more than one Person that you’re speaking to out there (that first One being yourself).

ps. please see this as a work of practical art, because it really is that: getting good thoughts to be thunk by good People in creative ways that enhance mutually positive feelings ūüôā


Korreloiko kielen sanavalikoiman laajuus ja kielen kotimaan talouden rakenne ja elinvoimaisuus mitenk√§√§n ja jos n√§in, niin miten? Kielitieteilij√§t, kysynt√§√§ Markkinatieteen puolelta jaettu. Mik√§ on kielten rakenteellisen laadun vaikutus yhteiskunnallisiin lopputuloksiin, maksimi-objektiivisesti taloudellisista tilastoista mitaten? Onko kielen vaikutus suurempi kuin geopolitiikan, vai ovatko ne ristiinkytk√∂ksiss√§? ūüėČ


The automation of the Flag is that it will always clean itself, for changes in its state will always rest assumed as such that whilst one group sees dirt the other sees diamond-gold: there is no way to know but to perceive, for even the statistics are subjective to opinion on their interpretation. Politics will not end, for everyone has an affinity to their home and the differences inherent within the nature of everyone will ensure that clashes of opinion will continue to happen in the future, as well.

That being said: the carrying of an entire Flag should be perceived as coming with the very real and physically-felt gravitational weight of the emotional mass of an entire Nation. It is like a Soldier‚Äôs full-supply backpack, but imaginary and meant to heal, not hurt. Those who strive to rise to the challenges of the Flag will inevitably meet themselves at the most powerful mirror of Humankind: the carriage of the joint power of our eternally Flag-bound voices, whichever Flag that for whomever and wherever is. 

If you want to take part in activating Humankind towards solutions that concern us all, but the thought of the emotional mass of an entire National Flag scares you (it should to some extent, but I mean too much meaning it becomes decapacitating – which is OK: remember what a minority societal leaders are), then might I suggest local politics or party activism? Mostly it is about pitching for money to make your local dream projects real with everyone‚Äôs (including yours) money. It is really fun and not scary: if I ever do politics again, I‚Äôll make it local. Right now I’m private sector and voting for it by voting blank (not doing politics does not mean not thinking about it, which writing about it is. But doing it: that is a totally different thing – I muse in theory, and project my power of practice towards my work).

But hmmm if you‚Äôre a Global Person, is local actually National? Relativity of power: really depends on how you look at it haha but I am mostly an International Person by background and having lived in the skies of the Money am rather well-versed in the international scene, especially amongst my age group. That just bodes well for good long-term party-invite potential and deal-operational success. So I guess I’m more National-local than Ground-local.

I am of course saying all this because I think politics would improve if the People going into it were a bit more scared at the offset because that ounce of added fear increases their perceptional capacity (which is the function of fear in keeping you alive, honestly one of the best things I’ve learned from skydiving) and that is what they need at this time to understand the evolutionary changes going on with how society works and could work with modern technology (as compared to before it). Also the heightening of the skill-level demand for the Flag-bearing political job should make it more enticing for higher-level competitors stepping up to the plate to stand on behalf of the People. I’ll be the first to admit: top-level performers seek other top-level performers so that everyone’s forward-pushing drive motivates everyone else. Right now, political parties in Finland behave mostly (as I understand they operate mostly everywhere else, as well) with the manner of anything goes: there is a shortage of high-level candidates.

Based on what I have seen, it is purely because of a lack of skilled sales: my experience is that political parties are good at reciting historical rhetoric, but fundamentally bad at creating it anew. That is what is needed to make direct recruitments into politics, for example: high-level private sector leaders with significant large-organization experience have actually built the stories of the strategies that they have then made reality. They don’t want to come and recite an ever-continuing philosophical poem. They want to build a vision and execute and – yes – whilst that is based on philosophy then it honestly starts to turn into practicality very quickly as you begin to tie it into the ever-continuing reality happening in the news day-by-day: Defence, Healthcare, Infrastructure – boom boom boom informational projectiles coming in from all directions and all levels boom boom boom “what’s your opinion on this?” “what’s your opinion on that?” boom pow pow pow so I mean going into politics is pretty much a choiced-entrance into an “invisible war” going on everyday (understandable, because politics guides the big flows of the money thanks to taxes).

You don’t get experienced leaders to go into that with just any old ugly-ass PowerPoint pitch. Political parties: learn about well-crafted PowerPoint presentations. Ask the Bankers and Consultants to show you how they do it: request to be by their side for a few days (under NDA) to look at how they work. If you learn the skill of presenting as good as a Nordea investment banker or McKinsey consultant, you might learn the capacity to speak to a large-cap CEO, gaining their trust and enticing them into a Flag-bearing political career.

But if your PowerPoints are shit then that is like showing up to meet the Monarch in a smelly suit. Think about that. I am not surprised private sector leaders continue to push in the private lane of progress that we ride year-on-year around the Sun. I have seen such shit in political parties: not for a lack of effort, but just as compared to where the front of the line in the private sector is going in terms of operational finesse. All of this being said, I think there will be those who rise from the private sector into the public: it will probably be because of some good sales.


*Pointti on saada jengi tajuu, ett√§ mun mielest√§, 4‚ā¨ ei pit√§isi Suomessa olla kenenk√§√§n silmiss√§ en√§√§ kauaa iso raha (jolla mainittu 12‚ā¨ voitettiin). Jos hypp√§√§ nelj√§st√§ eurosta kahteentoista euroon, niin itse kannatan pakan avaamista ja koko potin uudelleen sijoitusta (ostaa kuus Massia lis√§√§, 12‚ā¨ vabank). T√§m√§ opettaa ymm√§rt√§m√§√§n, ett√§ ei pit√§isi pyrki√§ ajattelemaan niin, ett√§ 4‚ā¨ on iso raha eik√§ ole t√§ysin poltettavan arvoista (jos pelaa kaiken ja h√§vi√§√§, niin se on t√§ysin poltettu – kunnes vet√§ytyy pelist√§ niin pit√§√§ muistaa, ett√§ vaikka on 12‚ā¨ tulovalmiudessa niin sijoitettu p√§√§oma on edelleen 4‚ā¨ – on kyse siit√§ mihin pisteeseen ajassa suhteuttaa p√§√§t√∂ksentekonsa, siis kun puhutaan pelin hallinnasta). Pit√§isi n√§hd√§ 4‚ā¨ niin, ett√§ se on polttamisen arvoista suuremman kertavoiton mahdollisuuden edess√§ (20.000‚ā¨ is big money), sill√§ nelj√§ euroa tienaa t√∂iss√§ takaisin ihan pieness√§ hetkess√§ (ja yll√§tys parikyb√§donasen mielikuvittelu on varsin kivaa silloin t√§ll√∂in, nykymaailman vaihtoehdot huomioiden varsinkin).

Mielipiteeni pelialaa kohtaan on se, että se ei ole vaarallinen additiivi elämään mikäli se on yhdistetty työssäkäyntiin (mielestäni Veikkauksen tuloja ei pitäisi tulla sosiaaliturvasta Рkaikki julkisesta lähteesta saatu raha pitäisi mielestäni paketoida digitaalirahaksi ja rajata ostopaikkoja hyväksytyn sosiaaliturvan käyttökohteen mukaisesti (josta Poliitikot päättäisi, säilyttäen vallan vapauden Ihmisillä) Рja Veikkaus ei olisi yksi niistä. Jos sosiaaliturva valuu suoraan Veikkaukseen niin Suomi säkittää pahasti luonnollisten kuntoutusrahavirtojen toimintaa vaikeuttaen Ihmisten saamista takaisin johonkin työhön: pelaaminen ei ole työn vaihtoehto Рvaan pikemminkin palkinto) ja järkevään numeropäähän riskienoton suhteen: minä itse tykkään metsästää isoja kertalippuja Рkaverini ovat kertoneet sitä pitkään. Kuitenkin kasvatus läpi koko Ilmailun arvoketjun on opettanut riskienottokykyä ja tilanteiden ennakoimista, jota tarvitaan voidakseen esimerkiksi pysäyttää pelaaminen etukäteen ennenkuin addiktionomainen imu alkaa vetää peliin sisään.

Itse taistelin itseni ulos F1-simulaattoreista: nuorempana huomasin aidosti hinkkaavani jotain yhtä mutkayhdistelmää useamman tunnin yli sen vaihtoehdon, että olisin lopettanut aiemmin. Kirjaimellisesti katsoin kelloa sekä simulaattorissa että todellisuudessa arvioiden niiden vaihtoehtoiskustannuksia: nopeampi kuviteltu kierrosaika vai pelaamisen lopettaminen, todellisuuden ajan alkaessa kuolla pois nautinnon hiipumisen myötä. Sillä todella, joskus monen tunnin pelisessiossa nuorempana saattoi katsoa kelloa seitsemältä ja päättää lopettavansa kahdeksalta, löytäensä itsensä kuitenkin vielä yhdeltätoista ratin takaa vittuuntuneena ja pahoinvointisena (vaikka jos se kierrosaika sieltä tulikin, niin olihan se hienoa, mutta sen vaikutus lannistuu sen edessä, että vituttaa poltettu aika). Summa summarum: fiilikseni on se, että kun saa oman suhteellisuudentajunsa kasaan ja on hereillä hetkessä, tiedostaen rajansa (lopetan kello kahdeksalta pelaamisen, ja sitten aidosti lopetan ilman tekosyitä: Inttimielentilalla) niin pelaaminen muuttuu additiiviksi addiktion sijaan. Kun on jarrut, voi pitää hauskaa.

Paras jarru on aina ajan antaminen (kuvittele jonkun mustan kiven tiputtaminen valoaukon päälle joka läväyttää sut pois valon luota ja aloittaa hitaan palaamisen sitä kohti kunnes pitää taas antaa aikaa ja pudottaa se musta kivi sen imevän valon päälle.. tämä on eräänlaista aikalampaan uhrausstrategian käyttöönottoa omassa toiminnassaan).

Odotuksen aloittaminen seuraavaan kertaan: koska se on sama asia kuin sen tekeminen.


I really enjoy the comparison between information guidance systems: from one extreme of IT development to the other of societal development. An IT engineer builds code, a lawyer build law: both guide the flows of information. One steers an IT system, the other a legal system. It is good to note that whilst an IT engineer can commit code into the code base at the click of a button (and perhaps a few QA processes) then a lawyer simply does not have the capacity to do that. Same concept (information guidance): completely different realities.

¬© 2019 Jens J. S√łrensen

Eat The Pie

For me, meaning is the first thing to not struggle with too much. A bit, but not too much. Because it will always reveal itself by itself, anyway, but also because the simple part of it is that it is. Even the lack of meaning has meaning: it allows for the valuation of the desire for meaning.


I think I have finally found the basest, safe solution to Tinder: when you’re going in, remind yourself that you’re thinking top-down. Head-first, date(s)-in-between, rest-later: if your head is on point, this is what I’ll think you’ll be thinking, when using Tinder. Like a security check before a sky- or scubadive, a top-check is a good run to have before swiping.

I know that this is obvious but as I have always said: the obvious needs to be said every now and then. If there is new obvious (Tinder is new, behaviour was old) then it isn’t obvious until it has been denoted out loud as so.


Having worked from home across the years, I must say that the Office is an important place for me. The rhythm brought to life by the going to and coming from is the primary start button to a healthy life: for me, at least. Assessing options through trial is definitely good for you if you learn to start leaning-in to the side you ultimately wish to prevail upon. So I want to be on the side of: Offices are good, but I could do like 3 days Office and 2 days Home because, to be honest, a lot of admin stuff (personal included) is just easier to schedule if you don’t separate the places. By this I mean that there is a lot of efficiency to be gained by being able to spend a day or two at home during the work week, because you can also do emails while the washing machine is running. Just as one example of being able to parallel process in life: bring the Home Box and the Office Box together 1-2 times a week: plan simultaneous tasks accordingly for maximal time-efficiency output.


I believe the best way to achieve objective objectivity in a contract, meaning maximum peace-building potentiality, is to pre-emptively hide God at home. Then it will be just you and the others at the table conducting the negotiation, and then it is right-on back home to our own beliefs again. Of course this applies only to non-local combinations of contracting actors (far enough removed to make religion non-kosher): if you’re an everyday Citizen working at the Church, then this wouldn’t apply. I’m sure you have God in there somewhere, in all the contracts that the Churches work with.

Truly though an ultimate way to define objectivity is to become it yourself through the embodiment of the freest contract: definition of Entrepreneur, time looking for money to carry it (which you at all points in time have the theoretical potential to become).

On other dimensions, there are other ultimate ways to be an objective definition: having a signed working contract (being defined as a Worker), being a Child to a Parent (not saying Parents view the Kids objectively here, but conceptually they are doing just that), and so forth. If you objectify yourself and consider yourself in your beingness an Observer of Yourself, then you are defining yourself as an object simply through the process of observation.

I believe a lot/all (a term defining the range nearing fullness) of yoga and similar is about this observation-based self-definition process, a continuing health and well-being enhancement technique. The natural opposite of this is of course projection-based self-definition: social media.

Remember, in my opinion: when it comes to self-assessment, be lenient and tough and lenient and tough and lenient and tough (keep breathing, life flows, as in: you know there are days and then there are other days – don’t ever be too hard on yourself, but be hard-on yourself).

You have to choose to want it: that’s what starts it, and proves to you that you’re doing it – yourself. For me, Aki Hintsa’s Voittamisen Anatomia started the self-assessment thinking on a more refined level: good results, I recommend it.


Autosexuality makes sense. It is the Person on the track that is ultimately just looking at their own time, knowing that is against which the race is ultimately won: by making it better. Like I said in an earlier post about the inspiring effect of Money People, then autosexuality is a positive race against self mentality. It comes down to knowing your measurements, and what adjustments you make in your behaviour to make them what you’re expecting them to be. So it is like the sexuality of leadership: loving your own results hahaha


The reason Ernest Hemingway was and is still so great is that he was able to capture so much perception into a single flow of solid depiction. Serious salesspeaker: I mean, I think he really lived his dreams in his dreams while he was living: you know, I mean he probably requisitioned a fraction of a light beam from our shared Sun for a dream-event moment as projected using the mass of Venus (where his soul was taking a swing-back through from a deeper travel) back at Earth where his Third Eye was receiving it to view a dream of himself in Old Man and the Sea. And then he wrote about it so fluently because he had dreamed about it so eloquently, for in some weird way and form, it was mass-based real.

Then the question becomes: what was the other simultaneous realm within our Solar System (or Galaxy? Was Hemingway a Galaxyman?) in which Ernest Hemingway lived in which he was an old fisherman having a social relationship with a younger boy? Perhaps Catholandia? haha I mean no harm just lil joke they are supplier of mass-based


UK politicians: you are dumb. Do not hold SoMe-People personally liable. That is an unintelligent way to move forward. You are all acting very violently, everywhere. I really recommend a breather on absolutely every single front, as communicated from the center of my n-dimensional Hilbert space. The thing about sales is that: it really starts with set and setting. If you take a step back: literally just accept that the problems will still be out there, but they’ll get worse if you push into them harder, so you might as well reward yourself with the wisdom of leaning out of them so that you can think clearer so as to figure out how to solve things on a more systemic level, which you need a broader amount of time to do.

And given that society has pretty much changed more than absolutely ever before in human history – let’s face it, smartphones are pretty fucking real – that would make right about now a good time to slow down and think about things on a broader scale. Which I am thus once again recommending that you do. Systemic solutions start with the big communicative acts: and the Americans are absolute total complete unquestionable Heroes in this regard as examples for humankind in history. The big speeches are literally what open up the People with the courage to discuss the big speeches further amongst themselves, leading to political innovation that makes People more happy. Ultimately, I think that is one of the best ways imaginable to get things moving again on societal discussion: because it is so very real.


As the very nature of professional employment requires spying (preparation for purposeful contact), then I do not think of foreign Spies as case-carrying shadow nerds or lovesick thrillseekers (which they probably are not): they are office researchers preparing decision-making material for their superiors, much like management consultants but for a different market of leaders. Since they are a part of nature, and I applaud Government actors for acting naturally, I think of the constant being of Spies more like the mysterious Nargles, introduced to Harry Potter by Luna Lovegood. They’re a more fun bunch to play with that way, what with all the spells and shit you can then begin to cast at them haha


What is projected thought that isn’t meant to incite any immediate action other than starting to think differently?


Everyone around the world is living and working exactly as they are so that the markets are adjusted exactly as they are so that the price of something you buy is exactly as it is. At the center point of fiscal gravity, the price is as it is presented in the moment. That is where it is found.


Fiscal Quantum Gravity: the story of how the pressure of the entire Universe condenses a point into a price. Could this be you and your salary? Well believing that is up to you now not me because I’ve just written the question and am about to post it and after that can’t really do anything anymore than assume there was a reaction of some sort, of which some I see in some form.


This is how I can best condense my relationship with the smartphone against those I consider addicted: I feel that my smartphone use helps me look out of it for the betterment of my understanding, not into it for the worsening of my health. Its inner realm is a navigational tool for the outer realms: like that intense handbag Hermione Granger has with all the shit that a Woman can carry especially if she’s an actual fucking Witch which Hermione is.


The race to not get caught: the race to catch.


If you spend extended time on a smartphone, especially on social media, you are projecting yourself across time at an extended rate. This as compared to not being connected, and being present in the moment. Depending on the content you are browsing, you are either looking backward in time (news of events) or forward into it (news of forecasts). You might be commenting (or projecting otherwise) similarly: across time. Each action of projecting emits a string through time and, if there is enough intent in the projection, starts creating potential in future time for you to be in a location.

If you have spent an extended time in constant projection and wish to rapid-eject (just delete the accounts and get on with it), you will start to come back more fully into your body, as you are now not investing the time into the constant projection. Everyone‚Äôs landing will be different and personal but it is my extremely strong hypothesis that the functioning of gravity continues to be so that what has gone up will always come down. No skydiving student has ever got stuck in the sky: jumping off of social media has a similar certainty to it – there is no way your body won‚Äôt catch you, as long as you persevere against the more-than-likely urges to pick up the smartphone and bleed your content into it. Thought of in a way: Mark Zuckerberg lives on global thought transfusions through his organizational spirit, Facebook. I don’t know if that is a fun way to think about it, but it is a way.

I am not smartphoneless, but see it as completely possible that my next phone will be a Nokia 3310. Now that I have tried the modern technological options across the marketspan of the past twenty years, I am – at least – starting to find my technological requirements list to peg to. I don‚Äôt know if Smartphone Certainty is quite there yet: it might be a device that I classify as ‚ÄĚprofessional use only.‚ÄĚ For example, amongst the Youth, it has clearly become a tool of profession early and naturally: so that is a great thing. But then perhaps overemphasizing unconnectedness at other times: a wise balance.


What is the relationship between Finland and Greece? They’re just a “capital letter” apart ūüėČ


The best framework for the understanding of leadership is the schoolyard. That being said the school is always the hardest to get your head into with other People: you only ever went to one school at a time. You very rarely ever went to the same school with every Person you know. But I’ll bet those networks exist out there, where literally everyone went to the same school. It is good to note how much power there is in an Eton, for example. If you think about a school as a motor engine in relation to its home Nation, how does Eton compare to its comparables in other Nations?

This is really good research.


By the existence of the democratic system a Citizen is always predetermined to vote. Not voting is a vote that in its unavoidability is just as valid as investing the time to go and vote. A non-vote is a zero-investment ticket (you’re not investing the slightest effort) and is de facto a vote for the growth of the private leadership sector. The balance of the societal system is always maintained over the course of alteration events: natural demand must be supplied and if faith decreases in the public system it will naturally increase in the private system. People will move from one group to the next in the event of perceived increases in satisfaction: the marketing race cannot be avoided as part of nature, even at the society-organizational level of coming together: the Field of the Flags, as they say.

I am considering a ‚ÄĚDon‚Äôt go vote: vote by sitting on your ass‚ÄĚ -campaign for representatives of the private sector but I think it might be an attack too much on the crippled Finnish Institutional system, given the Government just collapsed for the first time in 30 years. That being said: it isn‚Äôt as if it wouldn‚Äôt be completely legal (to advertise to not vote) to help People save their time whilst growing the money. Sounds like a more optimal formulation of equity investment, if you ask me: but you’d need reasons to trust private sector leadership (ultimately comes down to inter-leadership PowerPoint-race: it is what will be presented, not the Excel or the Word).

The only real difference between the leadership methods is that public leaders wish to be seen running around the media and private leaders operate the machine from the shadows of their workplace, preferring to focus on operation rather than communication. Neither is better than the other by default: they are different ways of leading that can produce fully comparable results in satisfaction outcomes for Citizens. The opposite natural outcome is the loss or gain in media supply for the media. If there are more private leaders, there are less tales to tell.

The main thing to agree upon in politics is outcome targets and measurements, and making sure that system-guidance is not too strong: that Imperius shite becomes quite real quite quickly otherwise, in my opinion. It is best as a leader to try and minimize one’s carried moral load: the lighter version is assumed moral load, where you just base your assumptions of your behaviour on your past and go with the flow. The load should never be a burden, it should be an up-lifter. That’s what it means to be happy in your position as a leader. If you aren’t, just remember: you’re shitting on the crowd.

¬© 2019 Jens J. S√łrensen

On Earth

I believe the Flags do not by their nature fight. By their disnature, they should fall into co-operative disrepair. But by their nature, Flags do not fight. When some day it will, inevitably, be Us versus Aliens (there’s no logical way to deny it: so it always make sense to prepare for some day), then I would not give them the respect of the Carriership of the Flag, even if they presented one to me. They would have to earn that with civil conduct and the capacity to exchange value through peaceful means: the kind where it is created, not destroyed. If they did so, I should consider whatever symbol they carry as their combinatorial function to be a Flag. But I am not expecting to wake up to Aliens. Not in this lifetime, at least, and luckily there’s still plenty of that left (I’m aiming for a 2111 post-body departure ship. I’m thinkin’: think about it once in a while, and it’ll come to you better).


I have outsourced the concept of infinite happiness to the Animals. That allows me to live in happiness and when I am not happy, I will consider myself slightly mentally ill. Since the Animals understand happiness better than I do, they will come at me through their silly memes on the Internet and heal me. Meanwhile, I will keep on going with my daily/weekly/etc. routine and just stop thinking about the Animals: the meme-weather will go away naturally. Thinking about things like this, I can learn to think about slight mental illness, just as a flu is not the same thing as pneumonia. That makes the entire concept much more approachable for the consideration of what it means when things get worse: because they really do, for many People, and since they haven’t, for me, that is why I choose to keep doing my best to help serve them through my money-based taxes and money-free community work (talk about private/public sector co-operation on the Individual-dimension, because that’s what it is: creating two fronts at the same time).


Mielestäni Rick & Morty on vähän niin kuin omissa säkeissään asumista. On jatkuvasti tilanteita missä päästään pälkähästä hyppäämällä jollain random-generaattorilla pinteestä poispäin, ihan kuin hattivatti tai sperma tai hattivattisperma joka nousee taistoon kerta toisensa jälkeen pelastamaan tilanteen syntymällä uudelleen. Mutta sitten taas tätähän kaikki piirretyt tai muuten jaksosta toiseen linkittymättömät sarjat ovat (varmasti on piirrettyjä jossa on pieruhuumoria edistyneempää tarinanvirtaa). Logiikka käskee tietämään linkittymättömien sarjojen ymmärtämisen. Silloin pystyy havaitsemaan poksahtelevaa tajunnanvirtaa, uudelleensyntymisen tuskaa ja tietämättömyyttä, toki myös seikkailuhalukkuutta. Tositilanteissa ei sitten kuitenkaan paljoa seikkailla: silloin käytetään harjoitettua tietoa. Mutta niissä piirretyissä: kyllähän ne seikkailut hauskoja ovat.

Olen viime aikoina miettinyt paljon jo lapsesta asti kantamaani omaa sanontaa: “in life there is no reset button.” T√§m√§n viisauden oppiminen oli loppupeleiss√§ l√§ht√∂ist√§ puhtaasti siit√§, ett√§ ajoin ja ajan edelleen paljon F1-simulaattorilla ja siin√§ logiikka on todellisuuteen hieman k√§√§nteinen: oma ajotyylini on se, ett√§ alan heti mets√§st√§m√§√§n maksimijarrutuspistett√§ ja optimoimaan huippuaikaa hidastamalla jarrutuksia kun meni yli –> reset. Todellisuudessa n√§in ei voi tehd√§, joten mutkaa l√§hestyt√§√§n varovaisemmin, sitten kierros kierrokselta nopeuttaen: kuin el√§int√§ preerialla vaaniessa ja kaataessa.

Varmistan toki aina harjoittavani todellisuuden logiikkaa todellisuudessa, ja mielikuvituksen mielikuvituksessa! ūüėÄ Startup-maailmasta etenkin kun kumpuaa niin mielikuvitusmoodissa el√§minen (jonka moodissa ei voisi loputtomasti olla) ja siit√§ el√§misest√§ poisoppiminen pit√§√§ kokemalla oppia: ei sit√§ luonnonprosessia vaan voi mill√§√§n pelk√§st√§√§n opettaa. Ehk√§ pit√§isi perustaa erillinen Yritt√§j√§korkeakoulu: se voisi olla luonnollinen omana eriytettyn√§ oppilaitoksenaan. Ainakin siin√§, ett√§ se toteuttaisi omaa luontoaan Kauppakorkeakoulujen Instituutiota vastaan kilpailemalla: rekrytoinneista sis√§√§n ja ulos toimittaessaan.

Could be fun ūüėČ


One of the main problems on Earth: too many advisors to leadership. Removes time from capability to lead if too many.


Understanding the importance of Family begins with understanding your Family, and then Family as a concept. As a surface-fan of Lord of the Rings, I really like thinking how the ring, as a technology, really embodies one of the great leaps made through time: the signification of becoming from Child into Adult. What’s fun thinking about, in relation to LotR, is what the ring of rings is in reality.


For anyone who understands compression: think about the fidelity of the outcome data that is growing in politics as relatively compared across time to when politicians had to think enough to write a full page to convey a thought: now that is being compressed into tweets and rapid-fired like a machine gun at society (recipient of political data, by nature of sales cycle). Do we want that? I am honestly of the opinion that the Finnish Government should be turned into the most objective supercomputer that can be designed (everyone has to be able to understand it for trust) so that we can just press delete on politics as it has stood until this day and redefine it so that it makes sense in the times of tomorrow.

We have elections coming up. I’m going to not vote for the first time in my life, since I literally feel it is the best vote I can give. I’ve literally had enough of the system of thought where those who yell loudest and most violently (which literally means against the entire concept of rationality: the exact worst way to get to the money, it is what inspires higher security investments?) should literally have to be listened to.


Defines long-term success. Not aimed for: held. Like Base. Remember: if you overdesign it with all the hippies selling self-help, you’ll probably be overdriving it, as well. Life lives on much broader timescales than the distance to the next time someone loses their shit and brings it together with a book. And I am not saying there is anything wrong with that: writing is (not even probably: is) the best mental recovery there is. I’m just saying that on the demand-side of the calculation some People overdo it with the books and underdo it in the lived reality where skills are practiced and then formed to be had.
If so, whatever? There can be no absolute understanding of data sub-organism impact on whole.

Love: it begins with processing time. It can be accelerated further in various ways, of which money is one.


The reason this post is titled “On Earth” is because that is where I am.


Have you heard of the fear of the fear of the Child? Now you have ūüôā


It is not that the state of nature is war. It is that war is not the state of nature. It is the state of destructive nature. Is that what we are in, in destroying the nature? Maybe some of the Old can answer that: you know, because they control the Money – not for any other discriminatory reason than the familial logic. By default, Money (especially with a capital “M”: like the concept) and its holding is equatable to Elders. It would be silly the other way (full Elder-to-Child outsourcing): that a Baby should be born and act as Bank for the Dying? Maybe that is why they died, and became the silly joke (though if you objectify life to a constant on-going meat trade, then that is sort of exactly what it is and it is gross in a way haha).

For me, at least, the Elder is the Money. It also sort of means, Elder: you’re not dead yet: get to work learning about climate change prevention technology and meeting the People that make it so that you can assess in all your Earth-born wisdom whether or not they are trustworthy People to lead us on this quest into the Heavens of the times after the climate change was prevented and we could tell stories about it and drink merrily into the night and wake up with shit on our face because – “hey, it got wild at the Farm.” (fell asleep in the barn): that’d make a great country song (plz send royalties).


Eläin ja raha: kaksi eri asiaa. Aivan kuten aika ja raha. Tämän pitäisi olla eläinasioiden taloustieteeseen mukaan seostamisen lähtökohta. Arvojen positiivista kehittymistä ajatellen, siis. Maanviljelijät voisivat puhua tästä, ja opettaa Akatemiaa oikein rankalla kokonaisuudella näistä asioista. Pitäisikö ehdottaa MTK:lle? Heidän meininki, tavattuna viime vuonna Arkadia-verkoston kautta, on ollut vakuuttavinta operatiivisen ajattelun esittämistä (jätettäköön tilaa akateemiselle ajattelulle ja muulle ajattelulle tietenkin, myös) mitä olen tavannut matkallani läpi koko työurani. Todella toivoisin tätä keskustelua, välittömällä aikataululla.


Mikään ei ole tuhoisampaa talousajattelulle kuin taloustiedekunta jonka päällimmäisin henkinen asenne rahaan on sen minimointi. Tämänkaltaiset Ihmiset eivät ymmärrä talousjärjestelmän käytännön operoinnista kuin puolet ja siten he väistämättä toiminnallaan ohjaavat puolitäyteistä ajattelua käytäntöön neuvonannollaan. Suomessa on paljon näitä tiedekuntia. Historialliset syyt olemassaoloon ovat selvät РSuomi on ollut köyhä ja merkittävästi huonommin koulutettu kuin nykyään. Yhdysvaltalaisjohtoinen tieteensuunta edustaa pitkälti yhteiskunnan alistamiseen pohjautuvaa ajattelua, josta on todisteet kaikilla suunnilla (myös siitä, että tämä on lopputulos heillä omasta ajattelustaan ja sen toimeenpanosta).


Speed is a healthy way to think about things: we all understand it innately from the evolution of our movement from baby wriggle to office sit. It is also very important with smartphones in the Digital Age, because our minds are running at significantly heightened frequencies as compared to times before modern technology. We need to understand speed, parallel processes and alteration times better: otherwise we are not handling smartphones and modern technology safely, as proven by the general state of behaviour in the present day. I am quite surprised about the lack of IT industry veterans getting up off of their retired asses to speak about balance and control regarding the system they’ve created.

There are no better segments of Old to speak to the Young than the IT industry veterans. They’ve built the piping of the modern world: we now have to start setting them straight and cleaning them up.


I know in my life that simply because of how I behave I might have been perceived as a spy. But in and of itself a Person of the Money behaves like a spy, because they must always ascertain the reliability of the Other from the perspective of a potential impact on their fiscal-impacting brand (which has an impact on quality of life, if quality has a strong correlating measure with the amount of money reliably had). So, with all due respect for everyone out there who is struggling (as an Entrepreneur, this includes myself), then the Money itself is never to be blamed for any of the world’s misgivings. It is a question of how the Money is channeled. After that it is simply a question of are we ready or not to learn from the past and act upon it to deploy equity in a different way, ultimately resulting in an impact on our brand that should be fiscal-positive if we can safely assume that, no matter what, Money wants to get out of the situation alive. By which I mean that if the incentives are structured as so that – by believing a set of scientific facts about climate change – we can jointly know (as laid out in contract) that we should have a higher propensity to live should we make A investments over B investments: then we should be playing with those incentives right now (A investments of course being those that go into non-climate change-causing technology). Of course, this is what climate change conferences technically accomplish: what seems to be the problem is that the decisions aren’t flowing through the chain-of-global-command from the top to the operative bottom: where People live and work and lalalaaa life goes on. So maybe it comes down to a language that needs to be learned for operative success to come together.


By the way is it possible, by objectifying our thoughts through our smartphones on to a hard drive somewhere, that we are actually slowing down our capacity for communication? Because if we communicate with a less rapid frequency, we have more time to prepare better thoughts. Or (Better idea): is it that there are varying situations of various types of communication handled with different rates of success given input capacities? Communication: it is a naturally engineered practical art resulting from the impacts of beings sustained over time. And no: it is not easy to get sometimes, and usually that is when it is totally important, or not important at all.

I post my artistic thought with a purpose: it is literally an intelligence-based Internet Shield against the potential that the Internet should be constructed without my thoughts upon it at these present times. You know: like it is for everyone else in their chosen mediums of life-in-action, steered or ridden in – whatever the flavour of the means of the taking part, which we all do from time to time. We shouldn’t always be in action: that sounds like infinity war. Let’s remember that war is defined as masses in action against each other. That’s something that in general we don’t want to be doing, if we all want to live, because otherwise the Planet is going to die, and take us on the slow ride to hell. The fast way into the opposite path is a direct flight to HEL (because we’re not doing any of that shit up here no more). I duly recommend it as a commitment to be made.

¬© 2019 Jens J. S√łrensen

OK, MORE

There are many truths to being a Salesperson. The first of which is that there are many truths to being a Salesperson.


I think one thing that really impresses me about the People of the money is their constant desire to self-impress. Their desire to do their best fuels my desire to do mine. This sense of infinite acceleration, which can only be described by getting it, powers the entire machine that is the global economy. As long as the operation is ethically safe and fiscally sound for long-term operation (one assessment function: can be exchanged across generations with a pure soul: a clean conscience) then acting on behalf of the growth of the money should always be considered a good thing. In the freely willed exchange of value between demand and supply, which by its very own nature creates value (and by its very own nature will exist: for life must feed – like magnets have their opposing powers), it should always be thought of positively that work is being done. Accelerating the money to guide its flow, which is what finance is all about (for example): everyone working as a Banker should be proud of the role that they have in building the economy of the future, respecting likewise the work of generations past and passing that have built and are upholding the economy of the present. That being said: something is definitely up with the lack of the pace of progress right now. Isn’t there? It just seems like there are a lot of problems sitting unsolved and a lot of money sitting unused. For an Entrepreneur like myself, this is an unnatural combination of states. The faults must be connected!


T√§ysin p√§√§t√∂svaltakyvykkyyden aikaisuudessa oleva valinta: Yritt√§j√§ksi l√§hteminen. Revolution√§√§rinen evoluutio/evolution√§√§rinen revoluutio (kuten kaikki p√§√§t√∂ksentekojutut, jotka voi menn√§ satakasikyt tai kolmekuuskyt, tai jotai sielt√§ v√§lilt√§: mut ei koskaan alle, koska se satakasikyt on se puolikas joka pit√§√§ k√§√§nty√§ ymp√§ri unohtaakseen, ett√§ ainiin: ei t√§t√§ p√§√§t√∂st√§ ollutkaan olemassa (peruuttaa ajassa). T√§lleen voi tuhota menneen-potentiaalin tuhkaksi: lukittautumalla siihen, ett√§ kun on kyse p√§√§t√∂ksentekojutusta ni ¬∂180 < P < 360¬∂ –> t√§ysk√§√§nn√∂s tai t√§ysmuutos, tai jotain sielt√§ v√§lilt√§ on mahdollista toteuttaa).

Ja kyllä: yksi ensimmäisistä asioista mitä oppii on hetken määritelmän suhteellisuus, sillä Yrittämisen alkutaipaleen päätöksentekovaiheet yleensä venyvät melko pitkiksi (ainakin jos on koulutettu hyvin ottamaan vakavat asiat rauhassa pohtien). Toinen asia mitä oppii on se, onko Massojen vai Harvojen -tyyppinen Ihminen. Asiakkaat: heitä pitäisi kohdata, ja siinä kohtaa olisi aina peili vastassa.


You may laugh about me. You may not laugh at me.


Let me introduce you to the difference between uni-dimensional and multi-dimensional realities, which the Physicists have been pestering us with ever since the word “Multiverse” was invented. Ever since Rick & Morty.

OK – here’s the difference. You have a dream you went to Jupiter. In a uni-dimensional state of being, you walk into the kitchen and tell your housemates “I had a dream I went to Jupiter last night.” In a multi-dimensional state of being, you walk into the kitchen and tell your housemates “I went to Jupiter last night.”

It’s just a case of having the tools of education available to understand why that statement could be true.

That all being said: I find that being human is an exercise in both. The separation between fully-real and imaginary-real: hazy at best, these days (how would we know if it had always been so? Could emotions really travel through time? The answer is yes: that’s what happens with all the genetics stuff, allowing us to believe in the facts of the impact of the past on our present (on an objective, scientifically-proven level)).

But can we ever know what was felt in the past?

No, I don’t think so, because for me to know is to be: and what has be’ed cannot be again, except through conceptual transcendence – as in “there was a company but that company died and then there was a new company that was like the original company but it wasn’t the original company even though as a concept of being an organisation in a specific industry it was like the original company” all of which means conceptual transcendence: an essence that lives beyond space and time as it continues to be put to use).

For defensive purposes (so I don’t get lost in the dark haze of contemplating too many dimensions at the same time) I seek to always follow my Danish cousin’s very bright realization for an 18 year old: “I am me.”

Ultimately, that’s what it comes down to, so it’s always good to remember when deciding what’s real or not: it’s like a map home to your own field of truth. A good skill to have in this day and age: it seems like the Youth really have it together there. Perhaps better than the Older do?


Thor-wledge: If you want to play with the feeling of being high on power then go ahead and start putting the Cosmos into submission. 

An asteroid? Just a rock flying around a ring. A planet? Just a bigger rock doing the same thing around a bigger ring. A sun? Just a fireball posing as the center of it all, even if it is also just flying an even bigger ring.

Then again: do you want to test your perceived might against the entire Cosmos? It is heavy.

Or does the Cosmos keep you safe in your puny tinyness? As far as the Cosmos is concerned, you are like a speck of dust: what a quantum particle is to us. If that scares you, I don’t recommend challenging it. It will keep you safe better that way. Also respecting the quantum particles will help you feel more certain that you are also respected as the speck of dust that you are.

ps. you know the funny thing about relativity between the circumnavigational speed of the Planet around the Sun and the Sun around the Galaxy is that around the Sun, on the Planet, we are travelling at 107,280 km/h but as the Planet trailing the Sun orbiting the Galaxy we are traveling at 828,000 km/h. It is funny because, taking into account our multi-dimensional being, we are going at least these two speeds at the same time. Weird funny to be precise haha because in being perfectly still at my desk I am also not moving while I’m totally moving! Personally, I am really happy for the natural service of keeping my feet on the ground: as provided by Gravity.

“This moment of not flying off the Earth is brought to you by Gravity.

G: no whizz.”


There is the saying “Godspeed” that is used at the offset into hairy situations, especially in epic Military thrillers but also in reality, as far as I know, as well. I translate Godspeed to an immense speed that God can go at. That would make it “God’s speed” because only God can go at it: thus by forced fact God “owns the speed” (ownership as denoted into being by the apostrophe) because God’s being at the speed is the very thing that defines it. God’s owning it, creates the owning.

Translated into Swedish and turned into a product, at the same time, this would become “Guden’s Fart.” Whether or not that implies that the well-branded Swedish have productized a method to rapid-eject away from the expansion speed of God-originated flatulence: I’ll let them tell me, if they ever show me a product demo of how that would work. The only way I could trust such a product is if it had been designed in such a way that the ejection algorithm is sensitive to God’s diet, allowing for belief in the variable speed of God’s system inputs: which just makes God that little bit more real than before. But I wonder how they spy on God’s diet to allow for the education of the ejection algorithm to improve its accuracy? The main point is that ‚ÄúGuden‚Äôs Fart‚ÄĚ could by no means be a static product: it would have to be very dynamic indeed, because it is most likely that God’s range is broad.

I understand why God would want the Swedish to have such a product on the imaginary market. God would want to be so great as to help People avoid God’s system inputs: if that is what was to be desired, by working with the Swedish who make “Guden’s Fart.” Whichever way you think about it, God wins: because God is the source of the product and always gets royalties.


If there were to be a book of the money written with completely objective instructions put forth with completely predetermined certainty on how to behave in such a fashion that every interaction with another human being is had so that value is created to the maximal amount in all directions: it would have been written by God. All I know is that it starts with a lot of important things, one of them being Basic Finance.


There is a natural flowing balance between competition and co-operation. In our service deal with the Planet, it is a bit like this:

(Winter, take care of yourself) , (Summer, do that less)

We know all about this in the North.


Now that Economics is having more fun with this animal spirits -stuff (which I believe is good), then I just wanted to say that I imagine the behaviour of a General to be much like that of a Snake. A Snake is sort of always looking ahead or at the peripheries, but never going perfectly backwards. That is what a General does not do, either, so I find that there is a Snake relativity. I wonder if Finnish Generals race each other on the Snake-game on old Nokia phones, which they probably still use because they’re much more data secure than all the newer stuff. But the racing on the Snake-game: could be good for thought-reaction speed practice.

¬© 2019 Jens J. S√łrensen

IT has been chosen that the show should continue

If you have never considered Coder-Pope Relativity with future-projected space-time bend, then one aspect of it is thinking about the Grand Codemaster of the future who will spend the days reciting some really epic code.

(does anyone want to set up the betting market for someone actually reciting the above code that activated them: say 800 years from now? A Dannebrog away in time? That’d be fun: time capsules of code to wake up new Popes or similar in the future. Their initiation is like getting to open an old bottle of wine, by citing a really old slice of previously unopened code: in this case to learn about the circular nature of potential time)


If I am everywhere, am I nowhere: for I have devalued the presence of being?


People really need to understand that epic Individuals are also Human. Even though they are very good at what they do, they are not machines. They are just very good at what they do, because they practice a lot. So if you are a Person with a lower capacity for focus on practice – which there is absolutely nothing wrong with – then keep that in mind with epic Individuals. You can learn many things from your contrast: both ways.


Seriously one of the best things if not the best thing about being off of social media is the humour. After enough time has passed (I’m hitting one-year off Facebook and six-months off Instagram) I’ve started noticing situations where before I would have snapped a pic and shared it to everyone: now I own the moment and enjoy it so much more, because it is mine, had and uninterrupted. But then the humour: you immediately thereafter notice a string of pic-worthy views and have a chance to view them all, because your smartphone isn’t out! Your head is spinning around like “like like like like like” but just to yourself. I promise it is actually funny once you realise how awesome it is to experience the feeling of being completely in your own head (what’ll scare you is realising you’d lost it). But you must make the investment: jump off SoMe Ship: to experience the reality.


I believe it should be a well-believed fact that the Media has the power to start wars (a fact that is believed because it shall not be tested). If the Media starts to scramble, for whatever reason (fiscal, reputational), then their incentives to escalate pre-existing situations will go up as their capacity to see new situations (because of the scrambling) starts to go down. This can ultimately pressurize the winds of consciousness to a breaking point, because the Media sits on top of the power divide: if it escalates both sides, then ultimately it itself will rip apart in two as war breaks out and People choose sides. So therefore it is smart to pre-empt against this by holding the well-believed fact that the Media has the power to start wars, and to keep understanding what that means.


Raha on järisyttävän vahva voima. Ei se luonnostaan valu sinne, missä sitä ei kyetä hallitsemaan: se on yksi rahankantajien perusaisteista. Hallintakyky, siis, joka on oikeasti hyvin objektiivisesti kehitettävä taito eikä missään nimessä mitään erityisen vaikeata: kyse on vain siitä opetetaanko sitä vai ei, vai annetaanko rahanhallinnan osaamismarkkinoiden pysyä rajoitettuina, siten heikentäen kaikkien hyvinvointia. Ollakseni täysin rehellinen, on yksi hupaisimmista asioista, että rahoituksen järisyttävän yksinkertainenaidosti kymmenvuotiaille sopiva ja mielestäni peräti tarpeellinen Рmatematiikka on Maailman vahvin voima tällä hetkellä.

It has been said that Economics has always had “Physics-envy” in that Economics has lacked the predicability of fundamental base laws that Physics has. This is silly. For every action there is an opposite and equal reaction: for every credit there is a debit. Given that there are always two parties to a contract (Even if you’re with yourself, then there is past- and future-you, contracting in the now) then you will always have a balance in the meeting of concepts. It is pretty much what Accountancy is all about. How the balance of the meeting of the concepts plays out in reality – who loses their shit over what amount of lost money and when – a much more subjective matter.

But yes it does seem like high-time for Economics to really start talking about emotions, given it has been over 80 years since Keynes started doing it. I understand this can be hard, but perhaps there is a way to play emotional games on Excel – to learn. Given that using money in reality is, ultimately, all about emotion, then I’d definitely recommend Economists consider if the worthiness of their title is being given an Academically-governed, self-operated slice of equity (part of the Academic Commons) which is tied to one’s remuneration: creating incentives to continue equilibrating the market with the best available research – one’s own.


A contract-forming escape room. A contract-giver creates a contract-signing space that is as repugnant as possible for the contract-signer. Each moment that passes makes the contract even better for the contract-signer. But they must stay in the space. Could this be a fun game for Salespeople to play, or would it be considered ‚ÄĚDark Magic‚ÄĚ: a form of torture? Natural: that is one thing that it would be hahahahaha



Whatever form IT whenever takes: Information Technology (the concept and the reality): IT always is.


The evolution of intelligence is easily measured: YOUTUBE ‚ÄĒ> look at how intensely fast the Airplanes and the Boats and the Cars and the Trains and all the Athletes that ride in them to go and athleticize go as compared to before. Then think about how much shit they can calculate with all the supercomputers than they could before. That is pretty hard-ass data right there, even if it is just me saying it. Consider it an ad for the research I recommend you do yourself: modern technology and how we got here is awesome.


The speed of business ultimately reduces down to the interaction of the Server and the Served. What fidelity-level of quality that interaction is had in: that is another question, one that is more subjective.


Saatan olla Suomen lepäävin henkilö. En lepäävä, mutta lepäävin hahahaha


Muuttuvassa mielipideympäristössä on silti varma Ihmisiä yhdistävä tekijä: Sää. Millaisena se sää koetaan: keskustelun kautta yhdistävä tekijä. Ja takaisin mielipideympäristöön..


I know that Internationally there are People with Elite-financing. In Töölö Village, Helsinki, Finland: I sometimes have Elite-fooding. Your time is definitely worth the time-trip to the 1930s, which eating here essentially is. This is a super-tits place.


Literally never try and remove the melancholy out of a Finn. It literally powers us through the Winter’s dark lived in the Far North: the utilization of the skill of spitting out our hatred because of and upon its weather.


On tuplasti viestinnällisiä massaobjekteja jos tulee ravintolaan kirjalla ja kännykällä. Jätä jompi kumpi kotiin niin koet eri median välityksen tunnelmassasi. Kuljet puolet keveämpänä. Voit myös kantaa molempia mutta silloin kun päädyt käyttämään toista toisen kustannuksella niin joudut katsomaan kun toista ei käytetä. Tuplasti painavampi olo, ainakin kahdella tavalla kelattuna. Jätä molemmat kotiin: olet Luonnon helmassa.


All Salespersons-with-Apple know the Expectation of the Blue Dot: that‚Äôs a show you don‚Äôt want to have to watch too often. Especially when you’re expecting something big, which paradoxically is a nice place to be in: because you’re expecting something big. But I mean seriously God damn it with the Expectation of the Blue Dot. It is hell waiting for it to come in. In particular, even, when it’s something big.



Am I more Smartphone than Human? Ask my Thumbs: they‚Äôre the Ones balancing the pull and push between the force of me and the suction of IT. The screen: it’s not just like we go in and out of it. It’s exactly like we do.

¬© 2019 Jens J. S√łrensen

Sales Path Duality and the Fuzzy Truth

I know Finland is all about forests. I really do. That being said: it is the Mystery Spot in California that really forest-fucks your mind for good. I mean what in the fucking shit is going on with gravity and perception and all that over there?


I wonder if Jeremy Clarkson is also an autosexual*: does he get sexual satisfaction from himself? I mean – I really hate to say it – but for a second there I thought I wanted to imagine (for the lulz) that Jeremy Clarkson does indeed get naked at home in front of a mirror and compare himself to a Ferrari 458: “haha I also light up on fire!” Hahaha

*seriously though: I wonder how many People actually are this or are we just picking up on some self-sensory overloads from the Authors? Hmm. Ping me an academic study and I’ll trust its being. As for its beingness: I’ll have to try it on for size first, but I have always been a Carboy then -Man (bodes well for success). But – to be really honest – I myself wouldn’t get too much into that stuff, overloading on yourself. It leaves less space for others. But if I were to think of it like – uhh – I am like a car that drives around gathering money for my Family and future with said Family: I could probably work with an autosexuality like that (dreams of future highways). That said I’ll probably still be having some of the other type of autosexuality as well haha motivation for the Gym (Gravity’s most centred point – gotta be or you might break your back, and you need that not broken for f’in).


Onko Digitaalilapset hyvä nimike sukupolvelle, joka on syntynyt siten, että Internetin kuluttaja-aikakauden jälkeistä aikaa on enemmän kuin puolet heidän elämästään? Jos sanotaan, että Internetin kuluttaja-aikakausi alkoi 2009 (riittävä teknologiapenetraatioaste), niin tämä tarkoittaisi vuonna 1999 syntyneiden olevan ensimmäiset Digitaalilapset. Mielestäni etenkin heiltä pitäisi tällä hetkellä kysyä mielipiteitä Maailman meiningistä: ovat sentään jo nuoria Aikuisia ja hyvin koulutettuja sellaisia Рsuomalaisia.

Myös itse-edustamani Techshift Sukupolvi (jostain seiska-kasariluvulta Digitaalilapsiin asti), joka on elänyt kasvavat vuotensa digitaalittomassa luonnossa (mutta Commodore 64:sta se pelien ja koodien tie alkoi..) ja sitten alkanut aikuistua kasvavaan digitaalisuuteen: myös meidän ääntä voisi tuoda esille jotta pääsemme nauttimaan entisestään kasvavista tulovirroista tälle Maailman huippuyhteiskunnalle, meidän ymmärrystämme ammentaen rahavirtojen ohjauksen kohdentamisessa tässä hetkessä, missä nyt elämme.

Meidän isoin eromme Digitaalilapsiin on mielestäni se, että Digitaalilasten IT:n käyttö on painottunut korkeafideliteettisiin (älypuhelin, fideliteetti eli laatu) kuluttajapalveluihin, ja siitä aiemmissa sukupolvissa enenevissä määrin IT:hen asennoidutaan työn kautta, kuin luonnollisena liukumana. IT on kehittynyt kuin luonnostaan: työn kautta leikkiin.

Nyt pit√§√§ sitten tietenkin kysy√§, kun aina sanotaan, ett√§ “leikkiv√§ lapsi on terve lapsi” – ylileikkiv√§tk√∂ lapset nyky√§√§n? En tied√§, mutta kysymys on mielest√§ni arvokas. Sen tied√§n, monivuotisena Perinneleikit ry:n lahjoittajana, ett√§ he ovat toimintansa aikana vissiin kohdanneet jo miljoonan palvellun kansalaisen rajapyykin. Ansaitsevat himmeet aploodit t√§ss√§ hetkess√§.


All right Everyone, on-in from 0 to 1: is there Knowledge? Yes, there is Knowledge! What’s one of the first things you figure out? That when it comes to math, there’s always a further dimension: but when it comes to reality, that’s not true. “When it comes to life: there is no reset button.” Ultimately, that’s the biggest difference between Digital and Natural reality: been saying it since I was a Kid. God knows how many thousands of hours I’ve spent on an F1 simulator (and how many times I would’ve wrecked myself if I was trying to drive an actual F1 car haha can you imagine the G’s?! But yea so I am pretty good (still, 20 years in): I am “herrakirjuri” on F1 2018.)

Let’s remember that all Spies of National Governments essentially do the exact same thing as Sales Analysts: they seek information on the target that money is being extracted from, so that a decision can be made to either invest into the Sales deployment or not. Information gatherers, as a concept, go across all industries. Now that I mention it: throughout all conscious being, since my opinion is that the act of being is not possible without information perception, and gathering simply must be a part of that: at least on the level of your body gathering enough energy to project to your mind the information that it needs to take a leak. Because if you’re not getting that, that means you’re probably dehydrated and need to get some water ASAP.


If you want it done Nordic-style, sometimes you don’t even have to ask. That’s how good the North can get, in predictive advertising (which is a bit like saying the Sahara Desert which means Desert Desert since Sahara means Desert: predictive advertising is exactly what it is: predicting who will buy what, and projecting the message to test the assumption. So you could just say good in prediction or good in advertising but in choosing to say both it’s sort of like saying the same thing but then at the same time completely not so: the point is that sometimes not having to even ask makes sense because asking ahead of time is not how advertising usually works: so sometimes you will get an ad from us, and it is likely that you weren’t expecting it, which is why you didn’t even have to ask. Now that I think of it: this is just how advertising works – not something the North can claim as their own haha).


How would you create such a contract that you, as its Buyer, could say “Ah! No advertising in my life for five years!” The answer is by founding an Advertising Defence* Company, and then becoming your own first customer, and selling the method onwards (or setting up an associate training facility) to fund yourself in creating value in other People’s lives (but you have to get them to buy first).

Entrepreneurship: what addition or subtraction (opelated with multiplication and division and their continuous cycle of functions) do you want in your life, once you’re done making them?

*I think it is always good to note that the defence industry goes all the way down to Cleaning supplies and components and substances required for creation of said supplies. Even Janitor has a rank to pull: one over the dust. That is super-respectable.


Change. Sometimes you’ve got it. Depends on if there was a deal or not.

One of the main differences about the Digital Age and the time before it is the access and access-speed to data. In times before, much leadership was reactive: annual financial figures were studied and situations reacted to as they happened. What data allows us to do in the Digital Age is pre-empt disasters by being able to forecast problems before they happen. We can become more proactive with less effort. As one example, predictive analytics companies track data from the factory floor to spot anomalies before they lead to catastrophes: they are like Medical Doctors conducting a continuous health check. The Digital Age has only just begun: we have barely started scratching the surface of the possibilities that data-based forecasting provides us across societies. If consulting – in practice, coaching – was only available to the entitled before (because the costs of data analysis were greater, before it started becoming a commodity), then computer-based data analysis should make it possible for all Leaders across the economy to get help in operating their responsibilities. As we all know: they’re not light to carry. Consulting: it can help.


For me, relying on God to solve the problems when they get too messy is the economically-viable thing to do (you know: starts with advice like “sleeping on it”). Even if I’m having to slow down while God gets the stuff together (you know: let’s remember relativity of age! But which way does that correlate as regarding speed? Probably depends on the mental and physical demand-nature of the task at hand, as related to the operating experience and current state of the parties involved), I can focus on other things in life: making it a fuller experience for myself and the others around me to live in. What I make sure to do is not rely on God too often: that would devalue the power. For me, pushing myself mentally, physically, soulfully and spiritually is what gives me the earned right to rely on God’s power every now and then (that the contract should form). I’ll bet top Athletes feel the same: it seems that they talk about this stuff a lot (assessing based on news of top profile Athletes), because of the very precisely-measured impacts of their actions and the benefits and costs attached. There are benefits: surely that is an obvious reason why people choose to have the power of God within them, as a fact of belief (I think it helps One understand the Masses, and that’s useful to have in selling and keeping oneself safe whilst doing it). There are also costs: it is important to realise that religion is a bit like any other discrimination-undergoing environment. Being even a bit open on having faith in the power of higher-powers can cost you money (if your counterpart finds it scary that you have the capacity to outsource problem-solving capacity, then it is hard to say who is losing). That being said, it can also earn you money: because what doesn’t match on one end of the market, can match on the other.


Mielestäni on hyvä muistaa, että konseptiparina on olemassa Johtajia ja Johdettuja, mutta että konseptit ottavat myös tarkemmat muotonsa. On Turvaajia ja Turvattuja, on Leikkaavia ja Leikattavia, on Lentäjiä ja Lennätettyjä. Jopa Yksinyrittäjän ammatilla on vastaparinsa, vaikka ei ole alaisia tai johtajia: on nimittäin aina Asiakas. Onko Asiakas sitten aina oikeassa vai ei, muodostaen Palvelijan lopullisen alaisuuden: se riippuu monesta käyrätekijästä hetkessä ja yli ajan mitattuna. Uusasiakasmarkkinoita (joiden perässä jättää hankalat Asiakkaat) kun syntyy jatkuvasti: ainakin niin kauan kun ideat saavat kohdata ja kun halutaan tehdä niitä.


Varallisuuden avaimet. Se on vähän kuin kilpailu: niiden kiinni saaminen omaan tajuntaansa ja toimintaansa.

There are two ways to carry out a commercial deal: racing on the run or building the package. They have their advantages and disadvantages across different situations.

Racing on the run means going into a price negotiation. When racing on the run, you have a certain price range that you are trying to stay within or beat (it doesn’t matter if you’re buying or selling: same essential logic, the numbers just go in different directions). So, in the example of a salary negotiation, you might think that you won’t take anything less than 50, you’ll be thinking through to 100, and you’ll auto-accept at anything past that.

Building the package means ‚ÄĚstarting with the Banker.‚ÄĚ This is going the other way: not assuming price certainty (that a negotiation will prevail with a result) but investing time up-front to obtaining price certainty (also called cost-plus). The investment makes the difference. To compare against the job applicant racing on the run, an Entrepreneur might be ‚ÄĚapplying to work‚ÄĚ in a commodity industry. A commodity industry is one where the product is so machine-maximized that it is as available as air: a stable production cycle and maximum-cheap price. The only way to compete in a commodity industry (where you can‚Äôt brand-inflate) is by doing what you do faster and cheaper than your competition (commodities are natural races to the bottom, Nature’s counterbalancing against inflation). The basic strategic way that this is done is by applying new technology or using existing technology better somehow: the Engineers do their wizardry and figure out the competitive edge. Hence, you go to the Banker and put together an informational package where you calculate the costs of applying the technology to make the commodity at a certain market-defeating price, which you then sell at a certain (probably tight) margin.

When it comes to the deal, the price is it: it‚Äôs what you‚Äôve optimized towards. Theoretically, you shouldn’t have to negotiate, because you’ve calculated the optimal numerical reality that should seal the instant deal.

Theoretically. Racing on the run and building the package, in reality, happen all in one jumble of a mess called the everyday. Sales strategies play out naturally: you don’t see much haggling going on at the local grocery store over the price of a chocolate bar. That said, when you’re buying corporate supercomputers, things aren’t so straightforward. There are a lot of components going into a package and things don’t necessarily always go in as perfectly as planned. The numbers fluctuate as if of natural tectonic shifts taking place: essentially, that is what the colliding of balance sheets is, which is what doing deals causes.

But – yes – when you stop to think about it, then those are the two ways to approach the formation of a living, commercial deal: dynamic pricing and set pricing. Whatever the method, it will always collapse to a number at dealpoint. If there are questionables involved, requiring more due diligence, then dealpoint might be an extended period of months or even years.

The different paths of pricing duality have their advantages and disadvantages, which grow out of their temporal profiles and the relation of said profiles to those of the deal counterparties (as in how the calendar plays out – can the meeting be seeded, so to say) .

The reality of it all crumbles the theory straight away. Yes: the above depicts the two absolute ways that a price can be put together. A range becoming narrowed to a point by the pressure of a deadline (“the prevailing of a negotiation with a result”) or a pre-calculated & fully-fixed number holding until dealpoint (or not, meaning collapse to zero).

But, that said, reality is fuzzier: business relationships in Nature can continue for decades simply because demander and supplier like each other so much. The working time spent together becomes time spent together working: there is a big difference. The exactness of the price and the interest of pinging the market for options is swept away by the desire to keep life flowing: usually meaning that other options do not even come to mind, because happiness is already had.

It’s like I’ve said before: after the buyin’ starts the bein’. Once you’re pleased with your holdings, you can turn off or (at least) de-emphasize the buying-seeing and turn on the holding-seeing. So starts the being after the buying.

The buying-seeing uses more energy than the holding-seeing, and blurs your picture. I find that, with money, it’s a bit like driving a racing car, actually. The differences in speed narrow your gaze to a (braking) point where a deal is made and expand it to a full stop where the outcome of the deal is put into operation (thus becoming a part of the now-lived reality).

Like in all other action, a human being can only withstand a total physical and cognitive load of some amount. Alteration between states in speed also takes time: like acclimatising to jetlag or high altitude. Thus, the very real and wholesomely experienced pressures of handling capital can be conducted better and better with increased data perception, allowing for energy-loss points to be plugged. A Leader’s embodiment of an Organization is, ultimately, like the skill of a tailor or sports coach: fitting pieces together with practice until energy isn’t lost – it is gained, and seen on the income statement.


Olen ylpeästi Greta Thunbergin kannattaja. En voi käsittää, että yksikään koululaitos sanktioisi oppilasta joka osoittaa mieltään tulevaisuutensa puolesta. Lukujärjestyksen noudatuksen kirkkojako ne ovat, vai järjenkäytön keitaita? Mielestäni nuori käyttää järkeään ilmaisemalla mieltään ja osoittaa siten toiminnallaan mitä suurinta kunnioitusta koululaitokselle.


For any other Scientists trying to keep up: I believe the språk of sales is mostly consistent of an event-based language, which can be studied and learned for increased clarity, consistency, and more healthy co-operative competition across the global economy. It all comes down to assumed behavioural sets, which the Diplomats know all about. When operating internationally with matters of high sensitivity (such as corporate ownership et cetera) then having assumed behavioural sets is important. What if homo economicus (or one of its instances) is a mentally-operable technology: a business leadership simulator? When Leaders around the world play it together, the system can learn of them and define theoretical perfect behaviour sets. One benefit of this is that it could allow for more nervous-oriented type People (examples of whom I know in significant leadership positions) to practice the art before projecting the show.

Essentially, the Homo Economicus Games would be like a global business simulator. It could be engineered in such a fashion that it trains Leaders to be better Individuals from the perspective of the People they serve in the workforce and in the boardroom while serving the customers and making sure other stakeholder -relations are in check.

Who knows, maybe there’s even a gaming aspect to it that can expand to something much bigger than we’ve ever seen in entertainment: maybe the imaginary economy built on Homo Economicus’ Spine (core architecture and engine) will be significantly bigger than the real economy in the future, if playing the imaginary one is more fun than operating the real one? Who knows what stories an imaginary economy might be able to tell, given the freedom of thought that the imagination allows for? What I do know is that the first one to know will be (or will have been) an Entrepreneur: by definition.

I believe that one thing that that Entrepreneur will ask is “where does the border between imagination and reality lie? What is value, to begin with?” That would be a great way to start a speech about the Homo Economicus Games. It’d be like some Roman Emperor calling the amphitheatre to order before the commencing of the festivities. But can you get a good festivity out of an imaginary economy? Depends on the quality of the Emperor. They’re probably the first customer of their own game.


Tietääkö kukaan onko olemassa sanaa lapsenpelon pelolle? Se on hyvä voima. Auttaa tekemään parhaansa.


¬© 2019 Jens J. S√łrensen

Knowledge

Essentially, the entire value chain of top-level advisors exists to help support leadership in the decision-making process. It is so by definition.


Imagination is designed: reality happens.


Thor-wledge: Hela‚Äôs problem is that she wants to control everything, all the realms. Dear Hela – to allow for outsourcing and less stress: work with the other realms with the Money – you don’t gotta always be conquerin‚Äô. You’ll all live better, if you respect the Commons. That begins with having less realms: not taking too many, so the others don’t get their share. You have to understand that there are limits to how much you can carry, Hela. Every back’s got a breaking point.


Normaaliolosuhteissa painovoiman tietää: ei sitä niinkään tunne. Epänormaaleissa olosuhteissa painovoiman kyllä tuntee, monella eri tavoin.


Keeping an interest is ultimately all about understanding importance. If you’re a Banker, interest is important because that is how People pay you with their holding-time to take care of their wealth. Which you are interested in doing, because that payment is how you pay your bills. And the money goes on.

By the way, I believe this is a good reason to assume that money will keep growing: because it grows out of time, which just keeps on coming as a natural resource. There will continue to be interest, because People will continue to find their necessities for life important. As long as People can trust the continued being of money (for trust: it just has to flow in the correct directions that maintain econological (economy & ecology) sustainability), it will continue to grow in the long-run. If not by the logic of the continued revolutionary evolution of innovation, as Generations come and go (as the Youth come and revolutionize the Lands, Generation by Generation), then by the sheer expansion of Humankind further out into the Solar System, and eventually beyond (I do believe the Youth will continue to prevail, as well: the Solar System and the Youth aren’t in competition with each other – quite the opposite ends of the investment sector there! Space and Youth. Unless we’re training Child Cadets? I don’t think we’ll do that haha there was that Ender’s Game stuff and we don’t want to make it real).

Just because it isn’t happening tomorrow or notification-ohh-right-now doesn’t mean it won’t happen. Decades-long investments that secure centuries-long potential: even they are at some point made.


It is how we ride the rivers of the money that gush, drip, and stream their way around the sun that powers the whole machine feeding our desires to do stuff in life. Step one: save the Planet. Step two: enjoy living on its surface again.

Your message response rate determines your working speed. Your message response depth determines your working fidelity. These are living functions (outcome undefined until reached) relative to the state of your own being and the beingness of those People that have a noticeable impact upon your behaviour with their own. These are the primary operative algorithms of sales, whilst the concepts and substances of money and time are what they steer across time and the market. What type of life those substances are steering through the contracts they are embodied into: that depends on who you are asking. But up to that point: market operants all be created equal, since they’re steering the same thing. The economy, that is. How well they do that, given relative-situation and other power-context: determines race outcome. What’s the race all about? Again: really depends on who you’re asking.


What’s your polarisation?* Never be ashamed of your natural preference: I love both but ultimately I am always going to be in for the Classic. One thing I wish for from the future is more trains: I’d love to add more train to my travel-method portfolio. Nothing beats a comfortable, long, well-rested and -dined train ride. Hot damn: trains of the future. That’s a time-pipe worth getting sucked into. I wonder when I can capitalize upon the accelerating function of the money in making the time-pipe dreamphase actually real? As an Entrepreneur, that is what I do: aim for the real thing, then try to get there (understand the motivational power of dreams, know the actual power of mind and muscle). Updated April 2nd, 2019: I just realized that the entire Classic Economy is a ploy to travel to meet People on Company money haha but I believe that is worth constantly funding at lower- and higher-levels of seniority, because I’m a fan of the travel: and am happy with freeways and trains if the aviation industry ends up having a last flight, climate change et cetera.. I doubt it, however, even if it might be possible a century or two from now).

EDIT:// April 11th, 2019: Happy to see that I am not the only one carrying this idea. Given that this is far-removed from myself and in the UK, I’d say that even this one data point proves there is an order in the demand-pipeline from the People for this.

If Facebook were to operate upon a User ID -system built upon hard-, Government-verified -login (easily doable via mobile operators), then the value of a click and impression would go up, because the definition of its human origin would be of a higher-fidelity. The thing about Government-verified ID is that you actually have to show up somewhere, in the flesh, to get it. That’s just a great quality-assurance and value-retainment access-protocol to have, and a stupid one to throw away as an option to use because of things such as, for example, anti-Government sentiment. The truth is: having ID is what makes us safe in the first place. It is how the authorities know who to protect and who to protect from.

Grounding Facebook into the public system, across its user base, through the identification protocol, is an excellent way to increase security on all fronts, at the same time, whilst also creating business value through more accurate data. The simultaneous census-like check conducted on Facebook’s operative base would have long-term valuational value for the financial markets: it will undoubtedly have an impact to see how much trash in the numbers is cleared out by the grounding process – for that reason I am publicly committing to remaining free of Facebook ownership (and commenting upon its share price), having just potentially impacted its value significantly (based on the assumption that I have supplied a workable, global solution to the regulation demanded by Facebook Incorporated’s Highest Leader, Mark Zuckerberg).

If Mark Zuckerberg is reading this: Mark – by offloading the ID protocol to the State as a natural monopoly, you also offload the costs. All of the costs: development, security.. Everyone wins.


The UN is silly.

Just because we can ask Human, then who is to say that Human is actually any happier than Dog, watching TV as compared to smelling a mate‚Äôs poo? Happiness: absolutely relative.


Reasons to Not Hate Life

There are many reasons these days to hate life: environmental ecosystems and their beauty are at significant risk, financial and monetary markets are unreliable, political movements have lost all sense of direction. History has never been at a point like this before: not least because of the fact that this text is being typed up on an iPhone and probably being read on one.
These things said, I think there are many reasons to not hate life.

For one: life is and will be. I am the type of Person that always turns the page on uncontrollables, accepting them and moving forward. So I‚Äôve really worked my way around understanding why it would be of the most silly essence to think that the very core (life) of what I am should be hated, the primary finding being that without it I should not be able to experience the joy that, if it isn‚Äôt here already, can be in the future. Because the future: it‚Äôs still out there, coming in as it has always done. What quality-level the continuous download flows in: that’s up to the work we do. The rate of arrival should, by all forecasts, continue to remain the same: one day, week, month, year, decade et cetera at a time.

Secondly: there’s just so much going on right now. Even if a lot of it is super dumb (just.. on another level; dimension even) then at least there is none of the worst fear that exists: that there shouldn’t be any work. There is so much work: the main problem is access. The investment into the leadership and capital required to create work by organizing the workers into solving the problem: that is important, especially if you want to say that you are creating work.

As a final point, at least there is content on the flight down to hell: if that’s where you’re stuck. Netflix, public libraries: so much content. Omnomnom.


What is the fear of an airport nationalist upon a flight to HEL? That the airport at HEL is better than the one at home. One does not wish to be worse than HEL. That does not mean one cannot be it. HEL is a pretty good airport. Better than Arlanda and Kastrup, at least.

Welcome to the intra-North battles of quality supremacy, as flown into and out of. Then we also have the other battles where we walk into and out of, like foyers and lobbies (never underestimate the power-perception force of an astonishing lobby, not to even begin to mention the entrance to your home).


Then it gets very real, because it is defined in contract tied to many People.

¬© 2019 Jens J. S√łrensen