Balance

Siel ollaa. Ja sit sielt tullaa pois. Ja sit siel ollaa taas. Ja sit sielt tullaa pois. Ja elämä jatkuu.
Here I combine what I learned from Dr. David Sloan Wilson and F. Scott Fitzgerald.
There’s so much more to them than this, but you can only fit a certain amount on a Post-It.
When working with the infinity of thought, know when to take a break.
As One is something, and so is time: then simply by its being, time solves One.

© 2019 Jens J. Sørensen

Apex

Entrepreneurship is science-in-reality. There are hypotheses of self-as-supplier and market-as-buyer, they are tested, and then there is or isn’t money as an objective outcome. There will always be learning as a subjective outcome: an attempt never goes unrewarded, since data is always created. That People can choose to not buy from an Entrepreneur brings falsifiability into the process. That Customers as ”test subjects” act upon their own free will means that the ”Entrepreneurial experiment” is controlled by Nature itself. Entrepreneurship is really cool. I recommend it.



The prevailing culture of an organization is always a reflection of the mental capacity of its highest leader.

The prevailing culture of a societal organization is always a reflection of the mental states of its organizations.

Talousjärjestelmän toimintatahti ja sen eri osatahtien jakauma ympäri yhteiskuntaa ovat Kansan kello: kehon ja mielen tahdistin. On erittäin tärkeätä seurata tahtia, sekä yksilö- että järjestelmätasoilla. Missä pitää olla milloinkin tekemässä mitä: kuin koulujen lukujärjestyksissä, tahdin määrittely on vaikeaa ja aikaa vievää työtä, eikä sen arvoa tulisi koskaan väheksyä.

© 2019 Jens J. Sørensen

Suomi, havaitsijan näkökulmasta

Time is not money: time is relative to money. Time can be turned into money, just as money can be turned into time, but that does not mean they are one and the same. It takes a contract to carry out their interequital transformation, during the realisation of which one form of equity becomes the other. That said, in and of themselves, time is not money and money is not time. They are relative, but not the same.

Huippumyyjä osoittaa asiansa kauniisti mutta suoraviivaisesti. Näin saavutetaan teorian optimaalinen myyntisuoritus, sillä tuodaan kauneuden lisäarvoa ja suoraviivaisuuden nopeudella (olettaen täydellisen korrelaation vastaanottajan ymmärryskykyyn) poistetaan ajan kadotuksen ulkoiskustannuksia. Kaupan itsensä tuoma lisäarvo saa rinnalleen myös kauneuden mittaamattomuuden että ajansäästön mitattavuuden tuomat arvot, aivan luonnostaan (on toki syytä kysyä, olisiko kauppa toteutunut ilman näitä tekijöitä). Myyntitaidossa on siis itseisarvoa sekä ulkoista tehokkuus- että tyyliarvoa.


Akatemialle laajemmat sisäänpääsyoikeudet Pankkien sisälle.
A decision inputs energy to power the Humans operating the value chain.

Sekä pieni että iso rahaluuppi ovat käytännöllisiä ja periaatteellisia työkaluja. Erot eri polkujen ymmärryksessä, sisältä ja ulkoapäin, pitäisi havaita ja molempien hyödyllisyys ongelmien ratkomisessa pitäisi tiedostaa yleisesti. Aktiivisesti on syytä tiedostaa se, kuinka kompleksinen Ihmisverkosto ja juridinen suo rahaluuppien yksinkertaisen pinnan takaa löytyy. Peruslähtökohtana pitäisi nähdä se, että sijainti luuppien sisällä vaikuttaa todistavasti siihen väittämään, että Ihmisillä on eri näkökulmia yhteiskunnasta.

Ollakseen selkeämpi kokonaisuus, mielestäni kolmijako Taloustiede, Pankki- ja Valtatieteet sekä Tuotantotieteet olisivat Aalto-yliopiston kauppakorkeakoululle oikea tapa suunnata koulunsa. Näihin suuntautuminen toisena opintovuonna perustuisi yhteisille ensimmäisen vuoden opinnoille Antropologiassa ja Organisaatiotieteissä. Korjaus 15.3.2019: Arviointi-, M&M&M-* ja Tuotantotieteet. *Mainonta, Markkinointi ja Myynti. Ps. Käännä Talous-Suomen kolikko ympäri: löydät Pankin.

Minua kiinnostaa hyvinvoiva Rahavalta yksityisen sektorin ainaisena tukena erittäin paljon, sillä tiedän sen olevan terveen yhteiskunnan merkki Poliittisen Äänivallan tasapainona. Rahavalta ja Poliittinen Äänivalta tasapainottavat toisiaan ja sen myötä yhteiskuntajärjestelmämme toimii siten, kuin se toimii: loppupeleissä Poliittinen Äänivalta luo ne lainsäädännölliset puitteet jossa Rahavalta elää – ne ovat luonnollinen vastinpari. Sen takia kannatan Akatemian laajempaa sisäänpääsyä Pankkeihin, että Yhteiskunta saisi siitä lopputuloksena vakaammat perustukset. Pankki- ja Valtatieteiden koulu, osana Aalto-yliopiston kauppakorkeakoulua, loisi tutkimusolosuhteet jossa teorian ja todellisuuden välinen kuilu olisi sopivan kapea, mahdollistaen sulavammat ylisukupolviset kehityskaaret yhteiskuntamme perustuksien tutkimisessa ja työstämisessä. Julkinen ja yksityinen sektori luonnostaan kiteytyvät yhteen Pankki- ja Valtatieteiden kohdalla, jota ylläoleva Talous-Suomi diagrammi esittelee. Koulun ikään kuin luonnostaan kuuluu olla osana opetuskenttäämme, sillä julkinen ja yksityinen sektori luonnostaan kohtaavat ja tämä luonnollinen kohtaamispiste on niin merkittävä tässä päivässä, että se ansaitsee oman koulunsa.

Täten ehdotan koulun perustamista: Pankki- ja Valtatieteiden koulu osaksi Aalto-yliopiston kauppakorkeakoulua – omasta mielestäni niin pian kuin mahdollista. Lähtiessään ratkomaan tämän päivän tasapaino-ongelmia yhteiskunnan rakenteissa, tutkimalla sen rakenteita (esimerkiksi Systeemitieteen työkaluin) ja tuottamalla tietoa taustoista, nykytiloista ja tulevista poluista eteenpäin, Pankki- ja Valtatieteiden koulu olisi välittömästi hyödyksi Suomen puolesta, hyödyntäessään sen verorahoja. Suomen äskettäisen merkittävän vaurastumisen varmistamiseksi ja tulevaisuuden hahmotuskyvyn kehityksen puolesta, en näe älykkäämpää koulutusinvestointia Suomelta tällä hetkellä. Viestintätieteet (osana Valtatieteitä) tekisivät työnsä varmistaessaan, että koko Kansa kykenee ymmärtämään merkittävimmät osat näiden keskeisten Instituutioiden tehtävästä ja viestistä.

It is beneficial to keep in mind that lawyers have mostly been in charge of the construction of the foundations of the State, what with a boatload of philosophy acting behind the scenes. Taking into account a working generalisation that lawyers are hardwired by training to look to the future and imagine what can go wrong, then the State is by its constructed structures tilted towards standing on the brakes. Whilst this can be perceived positively as a conservative measure in keeping the People safe – which it is – then it is not conducive to the creation of an operating culture where a positive imagination of what can go right is fostered. This is what Entrepreneurs do – not those trained in the law. How could Finland develop the operating culture of its Parliament in a more balanced direction, where the positive imagination of potential success is emblazoned into being alongside the negative, almost depressive fatalism that so plagues the decision-making system of this Far Northern land?


Muita ajatuksia:

Maybe 2050 is more realistic.

Mielestäni olisi hieno asia, jos uusi Eduskunta menisi ensitöikseen porukalla mökille. Kokemuksena he määrittelisivät käytöstaparajoja keskenään siitä, miten Suomen yhteiskunnan huipulla ollaan yhteisellä mökkireissulla. Tämän yhteisen kokemuksen positiiviset heijastusvaikutukset saattaisivat olla merkittäviä ympäri yhteiskuntaa, sanan levitessä oppeineen – kuten se taipuu tekemään. Media: se kun on aina jollain tasolla läsnä.

FI Advice.
I’m not saying I have the funding in reality, but I have given it in theory: with this idea you are able to start the investigation of the practice and its potential. Must-use 300-year funding means that the project would be mandated to last 300-years: so large should be its scale to implement. First counter-argument you can take is that it would take less or should take more: I’m already leaning towards a Century potential-speed, because of the capabilities of modern technologies. Starting with correctly based educational investments, used to build IT-based economies operating around modern cities placed alongside a most arable route, this Project would immediately start to face many existent challenges. The primary challenge being faced by the Project would be climate change, with significant masses of people moving into technologically more efficient living clusters that are (because of the technology) more sustainable, as they remain within the Earth’s Human life supply-limits, by their design. What is an IT-based economy? Ultimately, it reduces down to an economy that has the self-sufficient skills-capacity to create and maintain websites. Education mainframe-up is required. With a price-competitive mid-market strategy, African high-tech cities (with healthy wealth distributions, for better international investment potential) – placed along this new Freeway Nile – could compete in the global market for IT services: especially against India and South East Asia. Maybe Finland could help on the strategic level with the full IT-education path, perhaps also in construction on projects that would require high-precision engineering, requiring experience from harsh working environments to prove problem-solving capacity (harsh which Finland is, capacity which Finland has). Oh – and – I’m not saying there wouldn’t be trains and airports, as well. It’s just that I’m a car person: even when we go electric, I like the privacy and I love driving (probably because I’m so good at it), so I expect they simply won’t be phased out in the future: by Nature, I believe there are many other people out there who feel the same way about private travel (possible en masse by car). Africa could set a great example for the construction of the infrastructure of the future.

© 2019 Jens J. Sørensen

Exactly On Time

Mainoksen vastakohta on kaupan toteutuminen. The opposite of an ad is the accomplishment of a deal.

Private Enterprise: to me, it’s more natural that way.
It is is important that it should be so, for otherwise the Entrepreneur would not logically be able to exist.
Whatever that whenever means in whichever money-making scenario.
J_SYK

For International trade done right, investment into developing nations should be more expensive than investment into developed nations, because they are less efficient, and also because the premium allows developing nations to obtain the ability to catch up on standards-of-living, which is a good thing to support in its happening: because it fosters peace by growing the market (as long as the market is assumed as operated properly). Thus, as said, one way to make such obtainability obtainable (by up-pricing production offers from developing nations) is by paying a morally-motivated premium when dealing with developing nations. This type of act can be conducted immediately by private sector entities, not relying on any government support whatsoever to slow them down in their already existent business relationships. Government support can be of use for establishing new business relationships, however, as they have the widest human-network power at their disposal for the acceleration of targeted sales campaigns into reputable networks and beyond into new ones. So – if you don’t have any existent business relationships with developing countries – slow down to work with the pace of your Government on entering through their networks. With developing: even at a premium, over there: still cheaper, than over here.

Well-being starts with its price.

Slogan (human-crafted primarily for all the Diplomats who are reading): for everyone’s benefit, the Few for the Many People. Feel free to join in on the campaign: Spend More, Not Less.


I haven’t published an opinion on Formula 1 in quite some time – it was 2008 when I stopped writing The Weekly Wrap for TotalF1.com after an eight-year run, starting from when I was 13. So now – I have two: firstly, I believe Michael Schumacher cries every now and then because there are F1 People saying that Schumi is unbeatable, an unsurpassable legend. I believe that the reason Michael Schumacher cries is that, having studied his immense levels of precision-seeking and dedication-to-work, he honestly thinks he was not as good as he thought he should be. So, Schumi cries because there are F1 People saying he is unbeatable, whereas he sees so much more potential for the development of the sport and the drivers within it. Secondly, I have faith that Sebastian Vettel will catch Lewis Hamilton this year and win the Championship, bringing their title race to 5-5 and starting a race to beat Schumi, making him cry for a different reason, when either of the now-racing Two goes by (will that be for happiness at the development of the sport or for having been beaten – only Schumi will know). Valtteri Bottas will drive extremely well and give Sebastian Vettel a real run for his money: not enough to win the Championship, but well enough to keep his seat at Mercedes. I hope Verstappen will finish a solid third, because I want him to become a Schumacher Contender during his career.


Työkalu muutoksen ajoille ja niiden ymmärtämiseen. Next question: What is an RQ-HOP? It has something to do with – you guessed it – relativity, and something other than yourself.
Human X-Ray (immaterial).

“Aloitus on tärkein, tästä jatkoon saakka. Se avaa ovet kaikille sitä seuraaville onnistumisille.”

To me, the primary meaning of the Law is the existence of the State, which I can rely upon, as long as it keeps its weight in-check: then it is serving me well as the Market Person – Entrepreneur – that I am.

What would life be like if there was one working day, and six days of everything else? Fun to imagine: Centuries out, I’d imagine.

“Sunnuntaisuure, 12cl – se pienempi, kiitos.”

Basic stuff, for an Entrepreneur: sleeping well. Number one priority, for me.

“Joku aina eksyy labyrinttiin mutta jos tekee suoran tien niin kaikki pääsevät perille”.

Once you let someone in, you can still show them the way out of the building, but you can’t show them out of the time you’ve spent together: unless you enter denial.

As Concept/As Real: I live on Trust – with it I See. Hmm, interesting – could that be turned into money?

Dear Entrepreneurs: now is the time to ask for and send out money.
Entrepreneurs say: it is always that time.
No one laughs. Until they’re asking for it.


At his age, I’d like to know what he thinks of the subject. You know – it’s becoming one, of intersocietal discussion.

Dark Web political strategy: would it not be a smart political strategy to spend a steady annual stream of cash on advertising the risks of using the Dark Web, so that money can be saved from attempting to regulate something that is, by definition of its perpetual behaviour, unregulateable? It sounds more efficient, economically-speaking. It’s the application of advertising as a public good.

“Dark Web: We are not taking care of you at that point anymore. Best regards, State.”



©2019 Jens J. Sørensen